SETTLERS HONEY LIMITED v FIRST HONEY NZ LIMITED [2022] NZHC 518

SETTLERS HONEY LIMITED v FIRST HONEY NZ LIMITED [2022] NZHC 518

The application for a stay was dismissed because the appeal did not have strong prospects given the factual basis of the summary judgment, First Honey had avenues to raise or secure funds and had caused its own predicament by spending the money, and on balance of convenience the interests of justice did not require...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] NZHC 518
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Settlers Honey Limited; Defendant/applicant: First Honey NZ Limited
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
18 March 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim for Recovery of Money; Application for Stay of Enforcement of Judgment / Application to Stay Enforcement Pending Appeal; Hearing and Judgment at High Court (masterton)
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Stay of Judgment, Appeal, Constructive Trust, Money Had and Received, Summary Judgment, Set Off
Civil Procedure Equity Commercial Law Stay of Judgment Appeal Constructive Trust Money Had and Received Summary Judgment +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Settlers Honey Limited

Plaintiff/respondent

First Honey NZ Limited

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim for Recovery of Money; Application for Stay of Enforcement of Judgment / Application to Stay Enforcement Pending Appeal; Hearing and Judgment at High Court (masterton)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to grant a stay of enforcement of judgment pending appeal under r 20.10 High Court Rules 2016
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's appeal has sufficient prospect of success to justify a stay
  3. 3 Balancing of convenience and potential prejudice to parties

Ratio Decidendi

The application for a stay was dismissed because the appeal did not have strong prospects given the factual basis of the summary judgment, First Honey had avenues to raise or secure funds and had caused its own predicament by spending the money, and on balance of convenience the interests of justice did not require a stay.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • First Honey NZ Limited to pay Settlers Honey Limited costs of the application on a 2B basis together with such disbursements as may be allowed by the Registrar