DENNIS v GOODE [2023] NZHC 445
The court was satisfied reasonable attempts at personal service had been made and that the specified methods (affixing to the gate, placing in the letterbox, emailing and texting) were likely to bring the bankruptcy notice to the judgment debtor's attention; accordingly substituted service was ordered and service was to be treated as effective three working days after completion of those steps.
- Citation
- [2023] NZHC 445
- Parties
- Judgment Creditors: PETER RAYMOND DENNIS; PAUL STUART GOOBY; DEIRDRE McNABB, as executors of the Estate of Phyllis Lorraine Frances Dennis; Judgment Debtor: BEVAN JOHN GOODE
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 9 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Enforcement Substituted Service of a Bankruptcy Notice / Application for Substituted Service (determined on the Papers)
- Outcome
- Order for substituted service granted.
- Legal Topics
- Substituted Service, Enforcement of Judgment, Service by Email/text/posting
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PETER RAYMOND DENNIS; PAUL STUART GOOBY; DEIRDRE McNABB, as executors of the Estate of Phyllis Lorraine Frances Dennis
Judgment Creditors
BEVAN JOHN GOODE
Judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Enforcement Substituted Service of a Bankruptcy Notice / Application for Substituted Service (determined on the Papers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether personal service of the bankruptcy notice could be promptly effected
- 2 Whether the proposed substituted service methods were likely to bring the documents to the judgment debtor's attention
- 3 When service should be deemed effective
Ratio Decidendi
The court was satisfied reasonable attempts at personal service had been made and that the specified methods (affixing to the gate, placing in the letterbox, emailing and texting) were likely to bring the bankruptcy notice to the judgment debtor's attention; accordingly substituted service was ordered and service was to be treated as effective three working days after completion of those steps.
Court Disposition
Order for substituted service granted.
Orders
- The documents will be treated as served three working days after completion of the above steps.
- The application is adjourned with leave for the judgment creditor to request a further substituted service order if any adjudication application cannot be promptly served, with evidence or counsel confirmation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment