MT ADMIRAL FARMS LTD v GOODMAN
The judge found the process server made reasonable efforts, the debtor was evading service, and the proposed measures (email to instructed counsel, delivery to the debtor's solicitors, and delivery or affixing at the residence) were reasonably calculated to bring the documents to the debtor's attention; accordingly...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-e17e2c30_1378_4a8d_9b6b_2bbdd1950a8a.pdf
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: MT Admiral Farms Limited; Judgment Debtor: Deborah Marie Goodman
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 3 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy (creditor's Application Under Insolvency Act 2006) / Application for Substituted Service and Enlargement Pending Adjudication (pre Adjudication)
- Outcome
- Substituted service granted; personal service dispensed with for specified documents; creditor's application enlarged to 10:00 am on 8 June 2023; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Substituted Service, Service of Process, Enlargement of Application, Adjudication for Bankruptcy, Setting Aside Judgment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MT Admiral Farms Limited
Judgment Creditor
Deborah Marie Goodman
Judgment Debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy (creditor's Application Under Insolvency Act 2006) / Application for Substituted Service and Enlargement Pending Adjudication (pre Adjudication)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether personal service of the creditor's application can be dispensed with and substituted service ordered under r 6.8 High Court Rules 2016
- 2 Whether reasonable efforts at service have been made and the debtor is evading service
- 3 Whether the creditor's application should be enlarged to allow time for service and determination of debtor's District Court application to set aside the judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The judge found the process server made reasonable efforts, the debtor was evading service, and the proposed measures (email to instructed counsel, delivery to the debtor's solicitors, and delivery or affixing at the residence) were reasonably calculated to bring the documents to the debtor's attention; accordingly personal service was dispensed with, substituted service ordered as specified, service was deemed effected on completion of those steps, and the creditor's application was enlarged to 10:00 am on 8 June 2023.
Court Disposition
Substituted service granted; personal service dispensed with for specified documents; creditor's application enlarged to 10:00 am on 8 June 2023; costs reserved.
Orders
- Dispense with personal service of: (i) creditor's application for adjudication order; (ii) summons to debtor; (iii) verifying affidavit; (iv) sealed order on this application
- Service to be effected by: (i) emailing the documents to the judgment debtor's counsel, Mr David Jackson, at the email address set out in the application; (ii) delivering the documents to the offices of the debtor's solicitors, Godfreys Law; (iii) delivering the documents to an adult occupant at the debtor's...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment