CLEMENT v LUCAS [2018] NZHC 1799
The Court split the proceeding into two phases: the initial phase (appointment of trustees) was a necessary trust-administration matter so costs for that phase are payable from the trust; the revived substantive challenge constituted hostile beneficiary litigation (Buckton category three) so costs follow the event. Brian was the successful party on the substantive challenge and is awarded costs on a 2B basis against the unsuccessful parties. The trustees' legal costs are payable from the trust on an indemnity basis and the trustees' one-third share of Brian's 2B costs is to be paid from the trust. Keith and Derene are each personally liable for one-third of Brian's costs and otherwise...
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 1799
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Beneficiary / Administrator of Estate: Keith Trevor Clement; First Defendant / Trustee: Colin James Lucas; First Defendant / Trustee: Samuel Michael William Bassett; Second Defendant / Beneficiary / Administrator of Estate: Brian Campbell Clement; Third Defendant / Beneficiary: Derene Wendy Clement
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Proceedings / Costs Application Following Substantive Judgment (post Trial)
- Outcome
- Costs orders made as set out: initial trustee-appointment phase costs from trust; substantive challenge costs awarded to Brian on a 2B basis against trustees, Keith and Derene; trustees' legal costs indemnified by the trust; trustees' one-third share of plaintiff's costs paid from the trust; Keith and Derene...
- Legal Topics
- Trust Administration, Trust Construction, Breach of Trust, Costs Orders, Indemnity Costs, Apportionment of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keith Trevor Clement
Plaintiff / Beneficiary / Administrator of Estate
Colin James Lucas
First Defendant / Trustee
Samuel Michael William Bassett
First Defendant / Trustee
Brian Campbell Clement
Second Defendant / Beneficiary / Administrator of Estate
Derene Wendy Clement
Third Defendant / Beneficiary
Procedural Posture
Trust Proceedings / Costs Application Following Substantive Judgment (post Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the revived proceeding was trust construction/administration or hostile beneficiary litigation (Buckton categories)
- 2 Whether costs should be paid from the trust fund or personally by beneficiaries
- 3 Whether trustees and/or beneficiaries are entitled to indemnity (solicitor-client) costs from the trust despite a finding of breach of duty
Ratio Decidendi
The Court split the proceeding into two phases: the initial phase (appointment of trustees) was a necessary trust-administration matter so costs for that phase are payable from the trust; the revived substantive challenge constituted hostile beneficiary litigation (Buckton category three) so costs follow the event. Brian was the successful party on the substantive challenge and is awarded costs on a 2B basis against the unsuccessful parties. The trustees' legal costs are payable from the trust on an indemnity basis and the trustees' one-third share of Brian's 2B costs is to be paid from the trust. Keith and Derene are each personally liable for one-third of Brian's costs and otherwise...
Court Disposition
Costs orders made as set out: initial trustee-appointment phase costs from trust; substantive challenge costs awarded to Brian on a 2B basis against trustees, Keith and Derene; trustees' legal costs indemnified by the trust; trustees' one-third share of plaintiff's costs paid from the trust; Keith and Derene...
Orders
- Costs of the first phase (appointment of new trustees) to be met from the Clement Family Trust fund
- Brian Clement entitled to costs on a 2B basis against Keith Clement, Derene Clement and the trustees of the Clement Family Trust
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment