FENNER and ORS (J W SIBSON TRUST) [2014] NZHC 2564
The court approved deletion of clause 3 and replacement with the proposed modern investment clause because the proposed clause appropriately expands and clarifies trustee investment powers consistent with statutory obligations; the orders were made but will remain in the court file until applicants file an affidavit confirming no responses were received to the public notices in The New Zealand Herald and The New Zealand Gazette.
- Citation
- [2014] NZHC 2564
- Parties
- Applicant/trustee: Bradley Thomas Fenner; Applicant/trustee: David Clutha Gordon Bridges; Applicant/trustee: Paul Leonard Palmer Chapman; Respondent Interested Party: Attorney-General; Subject of Proceeding: Joan Winifred Sibson Trust (CC26611)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957 to Amend Trust Deed / Oral Judgment on Application to Delete and Replace Clause of Trust Deed; Orders Reserved to Lie Pending Affidavit Confirming No Responses to Public Notices
- Outcome
- Court ordered deletion of clause 3 of the trust deed and its replacement with the proposed expanded investment clause; orders to remain in the court file until affidavit confirming no responses to public notices is filed.
- Legal Topics
- Trust Deed Amendment, Trustee Investment Powers, Public Notice Requirements, Role of Attorney General in Charitable Trust Matters
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bradley Thomas Fenner
Applicant/trustee
David Clutha Gordon Bridges
Applicant/trustee
Paul Leonard Palmer Chapman
Applicant/trustee
Attorney-General
Respondent Interested Party
Joan Winifred Sibson Trust (CC26611)
Subject of Proceeding
Procedural Posture
Application Under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957 to Amend Trust Deed / Oral Judgment on Application to Delete and Replace Clause of Trust Deed; Orders Reserved to Lie Pending Affidavit Confirming No Responses to Public Notices
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 3 of the Joan Winifred Sibson Trust deed should be deleted and replaced to expand trustee investment powers
- 2 Whether statutory and procedural requirements for amendment (including public notice) have been satisfied
- 3 Whether the Attorney-General's report precludes or obviates the need for formal deed amendment
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved deletion of clause 3 and replacement with the proposed modern investment clause because the proposed clause appropriately expands and clarifies trustee investment powers consistent with statutory obligations; the orders were made but will remain in the court file until applicants file an affidavit confirming no responses were received to the public notices in The New Zealand Herald and The New Zealand Gazette.
Court Disposition
Court ordered deletion of clause 3 of the trust deed and its replacement with the proposed expanded investment clause; orders to remain in the court file until affidavit confirming no responses to public notices is filed.
Orders
- Delete clause 3 of the trust deed of the Joan Winifred Sibson Trust dated 1 February 1967.
- Replace clause 3 with the proposed clause set out at paragraph (a) of the application dated 18 September 2014 (expanded investment powers including wide investment powers, ability to incorporate companies, enter into derivative and similar transactions, appoint investment managers and administrators).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment