RE: ESTATE ELIZABETH JOHANNE WEARN [2019] NZHC 2763
Given the evidence that one trustee lacked capacity, one trustee was deceased and one had retired, and on the basis of affidavits filed and adequate service directed and effected with no opposition, the Court was satisfied under s 52 Trustee Act 1956 that it was expedient to vest the specified trust properties in the continuing trustees and accordingly made the vesting orders.
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 2763
- Parties
- Applicant (trustee of the Wearn Family Trust): Allister John Wearn; Applicant (trustee of the Wearn Family Trust): Patrick Noel Rotherham; First Respondent: John Stuart Wearn; Second Respondent (trustee of the Estate of Elizabeth Johanne Wearn): Allister John Wearn; Second Respondent (trustee of the Estate of Elizabeth Johanne Wearn): Patrick Noel Rotherham
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trustee Act 1956 S 52 / Hearing and Determination (application for Vesting Orders, Unopposed)
- Outcome
- Application granted; trust properties vested in the continuing trustees Allister John Wearn and Patrick Noel Rotherham
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Appointment, Vesting of Trust Property, Mental Incapacity of Trustee, Service and Notice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allister John Wearn
Applicant (trustee of the Wearn Family Trust)
Patrick Noel Rotherham
Applicant (trustee of the Wearn Family Trust)
John Stuart Wearn
First Respondent
Allister John Wearn
Second Respondent (trustee of the Estate of Elizabeth Johanne Wearn)
Patrick Noel Rotherham
Second Respondent (trustee of the Estate of Elizabeth Johanne Wearn)
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trustee Act 1956 S 52 / Hearing and Determination (application for Vesting Orders, Unopposed)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is expedient under s 52 Trustee Act 1956 to appoint new trustees and vest trust property in continuing trustees
- 2 Whether service requirements were satisfied and effect of absence of opposition
- 3 Replacement of trustees due to death, retirement and lack of mental capacity
Ratio Decidendi
Given the evidence that one trustee lacked capacity, one trustee was deceased and one had retired, and on the basis of affidavits filed and adequate service directed and effected with no opposition, the Court was satisfied under s 52 Trustee Act 1956 that it was expedient to vest the specified trust properties in the continuing trustees and accordingly made the vesting orders.
Court Disposition
Application granted; trust properties vested in the continuing trustees Allister John Wearn and Patrick Noel Rotherham
Orders
- The trust properties known as (a) 30 Whitewash Head Road, Sumner, Christchurch 8081 (Lot 1 DP 14731 and Lot 2 DP 348851, CT 200594) and (b) Waitawa Bay, Bay of Many Coves, Queen Charlotte Sound, Marlborough 8888 (Lot 59 DP 1284, CT MB48/232) are vested in the names of the continuing trustees Allister John Wearn and...
- No issue as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment