RE THE FRANK SYDENHAM SCHOLARSHIP TRUST HC TAU CIV 2011-470-001088
The Court held that the trust's original charitable purpose remained charitable but had become inexpedient due to restrictive geographic and administrative provisions; accordingly s32 authorised a limited extension of the geographic catchment to the Bay of Plenty Region and s33 authorised administrative changes (removal of bond in favour of a good faith undertaking, substitution and reduction of the selection committee, and authorisation to compensate members), and the scheme was a proper, approvable charitable scheme under Part III of the Charitable Trusts Act 1957.
- Citation
- openlaw-fe726722_75aa_464c_baaf_a873c917d128.pdf
- Parties
- Applicant / Trustee: The New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Limited as Trustee of the Frank Sydenham Scholarship Trust
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 4 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Vary Charitable Trust Under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957 / Judgment Approving Scheme (final)
- Outcome
- Scheme approved; order made under Part III of the Charitable Trusts Act 1957 varying the trust as drafted by the trustee
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Charitable Trust (s32), Alteration of Mode of Administration (s33), Cy Pres Doctrine, Geographical Limitation of Charitable Gifts, Residency Conditions for Scholarships, Court Approval of Schemes (s56)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Limited as Trustee of the Frank Sydenham Scholarship Trust
Applicant / Trustee
Procedural Posture
Application to Vary Charitable Trust Under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957 / Judgment Approving Scheme (final)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trust purposes remain charitable and whether s32 applies to permit alteration of purpose by reason of impracticability/inexpediency
- 2 Whether the proposed widening of the geographic catchment is justified under s32
- 3 Whether removal of bond and substitution of a good faith undertaking facilitates administration under s33
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the trust's original charitable purpose remained charitable but had become inexpedient due to restrictive geographic and administrative provisions; accordingly s32 authorised a limited extension of the geographic catchment to the Bay of Plenty Region and s33 authorised administrative changes (removal of bond in favour of a good faith undertaking, substitution and reduction of the selection committee, and authorisation to compensate members), and the scheme was a proper, approvable charitable scheme under Part III of the Charitable Trusts Act 1957.
Court Disposition
Scheme approved; order made under Part III of the Charitable Trusts Act 1957 varying the trust as drafted by the trustee
Orders
- Clause 6 amended to extend eligibility to past pupils within the Bay of Plenty Region (statutory boundary of the Bay of Plenty Regional Council)
- Clause 10 replaced so awards may be withheld only if the Selection Committee considers there is no or only one suitable candidate
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment