SETTER [2021] NZHC 1603
The Court authorised the variation of the Trust Deed under its inherent jurisdiction because the proposed change (expanding beneficiary appointment of trustees) did not alter beneficiaries' beneficial interests, was necessary or desirable for proper management, and while s130 broadly addresses variations of trustee powers, the particular amendment to appointment powers fell most appropriately to be authorised under the Court's inherent jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 1603
- Parties
- Applicant (trustee): Alistair James Setter; Applicant (trustee): Patrick Marcus Peacock; Applicant (trustee): Karen Elizabeth Middelberg; Applicant (trustee): Elizabeth Clement Jane Gray-Toswill; Applicant (trustee): Callum Leicester Gray; Applicant (trustee): Caterine Anne Avery; Applicant (trustee): George Hugh Williams; Respondent (beneficiaries): Beneficiaries of Central Hawkes Bay Consumers Power Trust
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trusts Act 2019 S130 for Variation of Trust Deed / Judgment on Application (orders Made; Reasons Issued)
- Outcome
- Application granted; variation of trust deed authorised under the Court's inherent jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Trust Deed, Trustee Appointment, Court Inherent Jurisdiction, Section 130 Trusts Act 2019, Consumer Owned Electricity Exemption, Commerce Act DPP Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alistair James Setter
Applicant (trustee)
Patrick Marcus Peacock
Applicant (trustee)
Karen Elizabeth Middelberg
Applicant (trustee)
Elizabeth Clement Jane Gray-Toswill
Applicant (trustee)
Callum Leicester Gray
Applicant (trustee)
Caterine Anne Avery
Applicant (trustee)
George Hugh Williams
Applicant (trustee)
Beneficiaries of Central Hawkes Bay Consumers Power Trust
Respondent (beneficiaries)
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trusts Act 2019 S130 for Variation of Trust Deed / Judgment on Application (orders Made; Reasons Issued)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s 130 Trusts Act 2019 authorises amendment expanding beneficiaries' power to appoint trustees
- 2 Whether the proposed variation alters beneficiaries' beneficial interests or involves distributive powers
- 3 Whether the Court should exercise statutory powers (s130 or ss124–125) or its inherent jurisdiction to authorise the variation
Ratio Decidendi
The Court authorised the variation of the Trust Deed under its inherent jurisdiction because the proposed change (expanding beneficiary appointment of trustees) did not alter beneficiaries' beneficial interests, was necessary or desirable for proper management, and while s130 broadly addresses variations of trustee powers, the particular amendment to appointment powers fell most appropriately to be authorised under the Court's inherent jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application granted; variation of trust deed authorised under the Court's inherent jurisdiction
Orders
- Variation of the Trust Deed as annexed to the affidavit of Alistair James Setter at AJS-2 is confirmed
- Orders granted pursuant to the Court's inherent jurisdiction to authorise the amendment to the power of appointment of trustees
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment