RE MACALISTER [2021] NZHC 3572
Because all adult beneficiaries consented via the Deed of Settlement, the proposed variation (addition of clause 5.3) did not remove any vested interest of discretionary beneficiaries, the minor beneficiaries' interests were adequately represented by their parents, the trustees had power to sell under the deed and the orders were necessary and appropriate to implement a negotiated, interdependent settlement and wind up the trust, the Court exercised its discretion under s124 and s133 to approve the variation and direct the sale and distributions as stipulated in the Deed of Settlement.
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 3572
- Parties
- Applicant/trustee: Graeme Macdonald Macalister; Applicant/trustee: Andrew Charles Macalister; Applicant/trustee: Robert Blair Macalister; Trust: Robert Lachlan Macalister Trust
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trusts Act 2019 and High Court Rules Parts 18 and 19 for Variation and Trustee Directions / Judgment on Unopposed Originating Application (on the Papers)
- Outcome
- Application granted: variation approved and directions given to trustees to sell property and make distributions; costs to be met from trust funds.
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Trust Deed, Court Approval of Trust Variation Under S124, Trustee Directions (blessing Order) Under S133, Sale of Trust Property, Representation of Minor Beneficiaries, Enforcement of Settlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Graeme Macdonald Macalister
Applicant/trustee
Andrew Charles Macalister
Applicant/trustee
Robert Blair Macalister
Applicant/trustee
Robert Lachlan Macalister Trust
Trust
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trusts Act 2019 and High Court Rules Parts 18 and 19 for Variation and Trustee Directions / Judgment on Unopposed Originating Application (on the Papers)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should approve a variation to the trust deed to permit capital distributions in accordance with the Deed of Settlement
- 2 Whether the Court should approve the addition of clause 5.3 to the Deed of Trust on behalf of minor beneficiaries
- 3 Whether the trustees may properly sell the Blackwood Bay property and distribute proceeds in accordance with the Deed of Settlement
Ratio Decidendi
Because all adult beneficiaries consented via the Deed of Settlement, the proposed variation (addition of clause 5.3) did not remove any vested interest of discretionary beneficiaries, the minor beneficiaries' interests were adequately represented by their parents, the trustees had power to sell under the deed and the orders were necessary and appropriate to implement a negotiated, interdependent settlement and wind up the trust, the Court exercised its discretion under s124 and s133 to approve the variation and direct the sale and distributions as stipulated in the Deed of Settlement.
Court Disposition
Application granted: variation approved and directions given to trustees to sell property and make distributions; costs to be met from trust funds.
Orders
- Approve addition of clause 5.3 to the Deed of Trust: '5.3 The Trustees may distribute all or any portion of the capital of the Trust Fund in accordance with the Deed of Settlement dated 2 August 2021' on behalf of the minor beneficiaries Vincent Omar Macalister, Leila May Macalister, Jack Edward Macalister and...
- Direct trustees to sell the RLM Trust property at Blackwood Bay (Part Lot 8 and Lot 9-11 Deposit Plan 1071) to Richard FitzGerald Macalister on the terms of cl 4.1 of the Deed of Settlement dated 2 August 2021
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment