Setter [2021] NZHC 1381
The Court authorised the variation because the application complied with the Court's supervisory jurisdiction under the Trusts Act 2019 and High Court Rules, the proposed amendment was properly annexed and documented (AJS-2), and the beneficiaries (through counsel) did not oppose immediate authorisation; urgency tied to trustee election logistics justified immediate determination.
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 1381
- Parties
- Applicant Trustee: Alistair James Setter; Applicant Trustee: Patrick Marcus Peacock; Applicant Trustee: Karen Elizabeth Middelberg; Applicant Trustee: Elizabeth Clement Jane Graytoswill; Applicant Trustee: Callum Leicester Gray; Applicant Trustee: Caterine Anne Avery; Applicant Trustee: George Hugh Williams; Trust: Central Hawkes Bay Consumers Power Trust; Respondent Beneficiaries: Beneficiaries
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Authorisation to Vary a Trust Deed Under the Trusts Act 2019 / Judgment Issued (variation Granted; Reasons to Follow)
- Outcome
- Variation of the trust deed authorised
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Trust Deed, Court Authorisation of Trust Variations, Service and Representation Under High Court Rules Part 18, Trust Supervision
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alistair James Setter
Applicant Trustee
Patrick Marcus Peacock
Applicant Trustee
Karen Elizabeth Middelberg
Applicant Trustee
Elizabeth Clement Jane Graytoswill
Applicant Trustee
Callum Leicester Gray
Applicant Trustee
Caterine Anne Avery
Applicant Trustee
George Hugh Williams
Applicant Trustee
Central Hawkes Bay Consumers Power Trust
Trust
Beneficiaries
Respondent Beneficiaries
Procedural Posture
Application for Authorisation to Vary a Trust Deed Under the Trusts Act 2019 / Judgment Issued (variation Granted; Reasons to Follow)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should authorise the proposed variation of the Central Hawkes Bay Consumers Power Trust deed as annexed to AJS-2
- 2 Whether directions as to service and representation were required for the application
- 3 Whether the urgent timing for trustee election processes justified immediate determination
Ratio Decidendi
The Court authorised the variation because the application complied with the Court's supervisory jurisdiction under the Trusts Act 2019 and High Court Rules, the proposed amendment was properly annexed and documented (AJS-2), and the beneficiaries (through counsel) did not oppose immediate authorisation; urgency tied to trustee election logistics justified immediate determination.
Court Disposition
Variation of the trust deed authorised
Orders
- The variation of the trust deed annexed to the affidavit of Alistair James Setter at AJS-2 is granted
- Reasons for this judgment to follow
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment