SOUTHALL, THOMPSON, McPHAIL, OLIVER AND BLEACKLEY [2023] NZHC 3165
The Court approved the proposed scheme because the statutory prerequisites were met, the Attorney‑General supported the amendments, the changes do not alter the Trust's charitable purposes and they materially facilitate administration by remedying impossibilities and updating governance, investment and indemnity provisions consistent with the Trusts Act 2019.
- Citation
- [2023] NZHC 3165
- Parties
- Applicant (charitable Trust): The New Zealand Police Dog Charitable Trust; Applicant (de Facto Trustee): Todd Peter Southall; Applicant (de Facto Trustee): Rhonda Thompson; Applicant (de Facto Trustee): Fiona Michele McPhail; Applicant (de Facto Trustee): Christine Faye Oliver; Applicant (de Facto Trustee): John Bleackley
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Variation of Charitable Trust Deed Under Charitable Trusts Act 1957 / Originating Application Determined on the Papers
- Outcome
- Application granted; scheme varying the trust deed approved and order made under s 53 of the Charitable Trusts Act 1957
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Trust Deed (pt 3 / S33), Trustee Appointment and Removal, Investment Powers and Prudent Investment Duty, Trustee Indemnity Limits, Statutory Procedural Compliance (attorney General Report, Advertising)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The New Zealand Police Dog Charitable Trust
Applicant (charitable Trust)
Todd Peter Southall
Applicant (de Facto Trustee)
Rhonda Thompson
Applicant (de Facto Trustee)
Fiona Michele McPhail
Applicant (de Facto Trustee)
Christine Faye Oliver
Applicant (de Facto Trustee)
John Bleackley
Applicant (de Facto Trustee)
Procedural Posture
Variation of Charitable Trust Deed Under Charitable Trusts Act 1957 / Originating Application Determined on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trust deed may be varied under pt 3 / s33 to address administrative impossibility due to organisational change
- 2 Whether substitution of a single Governor (Deputy Commissioner responsible for Police Dog Section) for a dissolved Governing Committee is permissible
- 3 Whether trustees may be given broader investment powers to comply with Trusts Act 2019 duties
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the proposed scheme because the statutory prerequisites were met, the Attorney‑General supported the amendments, the changes do not alter the Trust's charitable purposes and they materially facilitate administration by remedying impossibilities and updating governance, investment and indemnity provisions consistent with the Trusts Act 2019.
Court Disposition
Application granted; scheme varying the trust deed approved and order made under s 53 of the Charitable Trusts Act 1957
Orders
- Scheme varying the trust deed approved under s 53 of the Charitable Trusts Act 1957
- All reasonable costs and expenses of and incidental to preparation, perusal and advertising of the scheme and submission to the Attorney‑General and the High Court (including contribution of $750 to Attorney‑General) and any solicitors' and counsel costs to be paid out of the trust fund
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment