GREEN AND DM HASTIE NOMINEES LTD [2019] NZHC 1634 ()
The Court granted the vesting order because the present trustees were validly appointed by deed, the former registered proprietors included a person who was mentally incapacitated and unable to execute transfers, and s52 empowers the Court to vest the land in the duly appointed trustees where technical difficulties prevent the parties from effecting transfers themselves.
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 1634
- Parties
- Applicant / Proposed Trustee: Michael Charles Bentley Green; Applicant / Trustee Company: DM Hastie Nominees Limited; Former Registered Proprietor / Former Trustee (mentally Incapacitated): Donald Andrew Hastie; Former Trustee (removed Due to Alzheimer's/dementia): Meryn Hastie; Former Trustee (replaced 2014): Ngaio Farms Ltd; Trust (beneficial Owner): D & M Hastie Family Trust (No. 1); Trust (beneficial Owner): D & M Hastie Family Trust (No. 2)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Vesting Order Under Trustee Act 1956 / On the Papers; Judgment Granting Vesting Order
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Vesting Order, Trustee Appointment and Removal, Mental Incapacity of Trustee, Certificate of Title Transfer, Section 52 Trustee Act 1956, High Court Rules R19.5
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Charles Bentley Green
Applicant / Proposed Trustee
DM Hastie Nominees Limited
Applicant / Trustee Company
Donald Andrew Hastie
Former Registered Proprietor / Former Trustee (mentally Incapacitated)
Meryn Hastie
Former Trustee (removed Due to Alzheimer's/dementia)
Ngaio Farms Ltd
Former Trustee (replaced 2014)
D & M Hastie Family Trust (No. 1)
Trust (beneficial Owner)
D & M Hastie Family Trust (No. 2)
Trust (beneficial Owner)
Procedural Posture
Application for Vesting Order Under Trustee Act 1956 / On the Papers; Judgment Granting Vesting Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should make a vesting order under s52(1)(a) of the Trustee Act 1956 to change registered proprietors to newly appointed trustees
- 2 Whether former registered trustee's mental incapacity prevents execution of transfers such that court intervention is necessary
- 3 Whether technical difficulties can be remedied by the parties or require court order
Ratio Decidendi
The Court granted the vesting order because the present trustees were validly appointed by deed, the former registered proprietors included a person who was mentally incapacitated and unable to execute transfers, and s52 empowers the Court to vest the land in the duly appointed trustees where technical difficulties prevent the parties from effecting transfers themselves.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Leave granted to commence proceedings by originating application under r19.5 High Court Rules 2016.
- Pursuant to section 52 of the Trustee Act 1956, the properties comprised in certificate of titles TN143/132, TNB1/788 and SA19B/1299 are vested in Michael Charles Bentley Green and DM Hastie Nominees Limited as trustees of the D & M Hastie Family Trust (No. 1) and the D & M Hastie Family Trust (No. 2) to have all...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment