BODY CORPORATE 188529 AND ANOR V NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL AND ORS HC AK CIV 2004-404-3230
Application to join additional defendants was dismissed because there was no reasonable prospect that claims against proposed defendants could be readied for the scheduled trial date and because refusal did not prejudice plaintiffs who could lead evidence of reasonable completion costs and pursue wasted expenditure claims in separate proceedings; the prior adjournment history further militated against joinder.
- Citation
- openlaw-32032a14_250f_4ea5_81b1_2ab6fa40b72d.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Body Corporate 188529; Second Plaintiffs: Katrina Sangha; Davinder Sangha; Stephen Robert Devlin; Michelle Janette Turner; Lisa Adele Turner; Clifford Scott Parkinson; Judith Rosemary Halford; David Paul Halford; Blue Sky Holdings Ltd (as trustee of The Auckland Residential Property Trust); First Defendant: North Shore City Council; Second Defendants: Robert Henry Graham Barton; Kay Barton; Third Defendant: R F Coughlan & Associates
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Proceedings Building/weathertightness; Negligence and Negligent Misrepresentation / Pre Trial Telephone Conference and Case Management; Application to Join Additional Defendants; Trial Listed to Commence 8 October 2007
- Outcome
- Application to join additional defendants dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Weathertightness, Negligent Misrepresentation, Joinder, Case Management, Costs, Remedial Works
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Body Corporate 188529
First Plaintiff
Katrina Sangha; Davinder Sangha; Stephen Robert Devlin; Michelle Janette Turner; Lisa Adele Turner; Clifford Scott Parkinson; Judith Rosemary Halford; David Paul Halford; Blue Sky Holdings Ltd (as trustee of The Auckland Residential Property Trust)
Second Plaintiffs
North Shore City Council
First Defendant
Robert Henry Graham Barton; Kay Barton
Second Defendants
R F Coughlan & Associates
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceedings Building/weathertightness; Negligence and Negligent Misrepresentation / Pre Trial Telephone Conference and Case Management; Application to Join Additional Defendants; Trial Listed to Commence 8 October 2007
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to join additional defendants under r 97(1)(b) High Court Rules
- 2 Whether joinder would prejudice the existing trial timetable and warrant refusal
- 3 Whether plaintiffs would be prejudiced by refusal to join and whether parallel proceedings are adequate
Ratio Decidendi
Application to join additional defendants was dismissed because there was no reasonable prospect that claims against proposed defendants could be readied for the scheduled trial date and because refusal did not prejudice plaintiffs who could lead evidence of reasonable completion costs and pursue wasted expenditure claims in separate proceedings; the prior adjournment history further militated against joinder.
Court Disposition
Application to join additional defendants dismissed
Orders
- Leave granted to first and third defendants to file and serve a Statement of Defence to the Fourth Amended Statement of Claim on or before 31 August 2007
- Any reply dealing with affirmative defences to be filed and served on or before 7 September 2007
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment