GLADWIN & Ors V PUBLIC TRUST & Ors HC AK CIV 2010-404-001666
The draft will document, prepared by solicitors, found among the deceased's papers with the deceased's handwriting inserting beneficiaries' middle names and supported by contemporaneous hospital statements, was made after 1 November 2007 and expresses the deceased's testamentary intentions; accordingly the High Court declared the document valid under s 14 Wills Act 2007 and appointed the Public Trust as executor/trustee to administer the estate and distribute the residue in five equal shares to the named beneficiaries.
- Citation
- openlaw-20ca930c_2822_4ad9_b9f2_bc002ab7d544.pdf
- Parties
- Applicant Nephew: James Netzler Gladwin; Applicant Niece: Jennifer Netzler Gladwin; Applicant Niece: Carol Lucy Ireland; Applicant Niece: Caroline Agnes Loto; First Respondent Proposed Executor/trustee: Public Trust; Second Respondent Beneficiary/opponent: Gustaf Adolf Netzler; Third Respondent Named Executor/trustee in Draft Will: David Phillip Selkirk; Third Respondent Named Executor/trustee in Draft Will: Anthony Martin Fortune
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 9 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Will Validation / Probate / Judgment (reserved Decision Delivered)
- Outcome
- Draft will declared valid under s 14 Wills Act 2007; Public Trust appointed executor and trustee; estate to be divided equally among five named beneficiaries; costs split 50/50 between the estate and the second respondent on a 2B basis unless otherwise agreed or ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Will Validation, Testamentary Intention, Wills Act 2007 S14, Formalities of Execution, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Netzler Gladwin
Applicant Nephew
Jennifer Netzler Gladwin
Applicant Niece
Carol Lucy Ireland
Applicant Niece
Caroline Agnes Loto
Applicant Niece
Public Trust
First Respondent Proposed Executor/trustee
Gustaf Adolf Netzler
Second Respondent Beneficiary/opponent
David Phillip Selkirk
Third Respondent Named Executor/trustee in Draft Will
Anthony Martin Fortune
Third Respondent Named Executor/trustee in Draft Will
Procedural Posture
Will Validation / Probate / Judgment (reserved Decision Delivered)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the draft document found constitutes a will for the purposes of s 14 Wills Act 2007
- 2 Whether the document was made after 1 November 2007 so s 14 can apply
- 3 Whether the document expresses the deceased's testamentary intentions despite non-compliance with s 11 formalities
Ratio Decidendi
The draft will document, prepared by solicitors, found among the deceased's papers with the deceased's handwriting inserting beneficiaries' middle names and supported by contemporaneous hospital statements, was made after 1 November 2007 and expresses the deceased's testamentary intentions; accordingly the High Court declared the document valid under s 14 Wills Act 2007 and appointed the Public Trust as executor/trustee to administer the estate and distribute the residue in five equal shares to the named beneficiaries.
Court Disposition
Draft will declared valid under s 14 Wills Act 2007; Public Trust appointed executor and trustee; estate to be divided equally among five named beneficiaries; costs split 50/50 between the estate and the second respondent on a 2B basis unless otherwise agreed or ordered.
Orders
- Declare valid as a will the draft will document on which the deceased wrote the middle names of the beneficiaries pursuant to s 14 Wills Act 2007
- Appoint the Public Trust as trustee and executor to ensure all debts are paid from the estate and the residue is divided into five equal parts to be distributed to James Netzler Gladwin, Gustaf Adolf Netzler, Caroline Agnes Loto, Carol Lucy Ireland and Jennifer Netzler Gladwin
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment