R v “A” [2018] NZHC 2024
Impose a finite determinate sentence of 13 years and 9 months' imprisonment (end sentence) with a minimum period of imprisonment of 50% (6 years 10 months and 2 weeks) because the offending—repeated intrafamilial rapes and related violent sexual offending against children—justifies a high determinate sentence; preventive detention is declined because a lengthy determinate sentence, coupled with available post-release measures (including potential ESO) and the offender's expressed willingness to engage in treatment, provides adequate protection and opportunity for rehabilitation.
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 2024
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: A
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 9 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal (sexual Offences) / Sentencing (high Court, Auckland, 9 August 2018)
- Outcome
- Defendant sentenced to determinate imprisonment; preventive detention not imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sexual Violation, Unlawful Sexual Connection, Assault With a Weapon, Male Assaults Female, Attempted Rape, Minimum Period of Imprisonment (mpi), Preventive Detention, Restorative Justice, Child Sex Offender Registration, Pre Sentence Report
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
A
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal (sexual Offences) / Sentencing (high Court, Auckland, 9 August 2018)
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate finite sentence for repeated intrafamilial child rape and related offences
- 2 Whether to impose preventive detention under Sentencing Act s87
- 3 Appropriate minimum period of imprisonment (MPI) and percentage to be served before parole
Ratio Decidendi
Impose a finite determinate sentence of 13 years and 9 months' imprisonment (end sentence) with a minimum period of imprisonment of 50% (6 years 10 months and 2 weeks) because the offending—repeated intrafamilial rapes and related violent sexual offending against children—justifies a high determinate sentence; preventive detention is declined because a lengthy determinate sentence, coupled with available post-release measures (including potential ESO) and the offender's expressed willingness to engage in treatment, provides adequate protection and opportunity for rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Defendant sentenced to determinate imprisonment; preventive detention not imposed.
Orders
- Sentence of 13 years and 9 months' imprisonment imposed on the two lead counts of sexual violation by rape, to be served concurrently.
- Minimum period of imprisonment set at 50% of the end sentence (6 years, 10 months and 2 weeks) before parole eligibility on the lead counts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment