A, B AND C v D AND E LIMITED AS TRUSTEES OF THE Z TRUST [2022] NZSC 151

A, B AND C v D AND E LIMITED AS TRUSTEES OF THE Z TRUST [2022] NZSC 151

Leave to appeal was granted because the issues raised were sufficiently complex and novel to warrant Supreme Court consideration; the Court confirmed and continued a non‑publication order to protect identifying particulars and directed the Registrar to appoint counsel to assist given the complexity and novelty of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] NZSC 151
Parties
Applicant: A, B and C; Respondent: D and E Limited as Trustees of the Z Trust
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
20 December 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted; Interlocutory Orders Made
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; approved question framed; non‑publication order made and continued; registrar directed to appoint counsel to assist; timetable for submissions ordered.
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Suppression/non‑publication Order, Appointment of Counsel to Assist, Court of Appeal Review
Civil Procedure Privacy Trusts Publication/suppression Orders Leave to Appeal Suppression/non‑publication Order Appointment of Counsel to Assist Court of Appeal Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A, B and C

Applicant

D and E Limited as Trustees of the Z Trust

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Leave to Appeal Granted; Interlocutory Orders Made

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal was correct to allow the appeal
  2. 2 Whether a non‑publication order prohibiting publication of names, addresses or identifying particulars should be made and maintained
  3. 3 Whether counsel should be appointed to assist the Court given the complexity and novelty of issues

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was granted because the issues raised were sufficiently complex and novel to warrant Supreme Court consideration; the Court confirmed and continued a non‑publication order to protect identifying particulars and directed the Registrar to appoint counsel to assist given the complexity and novelty of the issues.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; approved question framed; non‑publication order made and continued; registrar directed to appoint counsel to assist; timetable for submissions ordered.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is granted (D and E Ltd as Trustees of the Z Trust v A, B and C [2022] NZCA 430).
  • The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to allow the appeal.