CAIN v METTRICK [2019] NZHC 2563
At the pre-trial stage the Judge refused access to the applications and affidavits because the countervailing interests—orderly and fair administration of justice, protection of privacy and commercial confidentiality (including existing confidentiality orders and implied undertakings), and risk of prejudicial publication of possibly inadmissible material—weighed more heavily than the applicants' public interest and open justice claims.
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 2563
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: R J CAIN and R G LOGAN as liquidators of Stonewood Homes Limited (in Receivership and Liquidation); Second Plaintiff: R J CAIN and R G LOGAN as liquidators of Stonewood Homes New Zealand Limited (in Receivership and Liquidation); Third Plaintiff: R J CAIN and R G LOGAN as liquidators of Holmfirth Group Limited (in Receivership and Liquidation); First Defendant: B A METTRICK; Second Defendant: J BOULT
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 9 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Directors' Duties and Liquidation; Interlocutory Applications Concerning Access to Court Documents / Pre Trial (access to Court Documents Applications Concerning Pending Substantive Strike Out/abuse of Process Applications)
- Outcome
- Access to the applications and affidavits sought by Allied Press and Fairfax Media declined
- Legal Topics
- Access to Court Documents, Litigation Funding, Open Justice Vs Confidentiality, Abuse of Process/strike Out, Non Publication Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R J CAIN and R G LOGAN as liquidators of Stonewood Homes Limited (in Receivership and Liquidation)
First Plaintiff
R J CAIN and R G LOGAN as liquidators of Stonewood Homes New Zealand Limited (in Receivership and Liquidation)
Second Plaintiff
R J CAIN and R G LOGAN as liquidators of Holmfirth Group Limited (in Receivership and Liquidation)
Third Plaintiff
B A METTRICK
First Defendant
J BOULT
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Directors' Duties and Liquidation; Interlocutory Applications Concerning Access to Court Documents / Pre Trial (access to Court Documents Applications Concerning Pending Substantive Strike Out/abuse of Process Applications)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether non-party applicants should be granted access to applications and affidavits filed in relation to defendants' substantive strike-out and related applications
- 2 Whether the public interest in disclosure (including identity of litigation funder and a candidate's involvement in litigation) outweighs confidentiality, privacy and orderly administration of justice at a pre-trial stage
- 3 Whether exhibited documents subject to confidentiality orders and implied undertakings may be released to non-parties
Ratio Decidendi
At the pre-trial stage the Judge refused access to the applications and affidavits because the countervailing interests—orderly and fair administration of justice, protection of privacy and commercial confidentiality (including existing confidentiality orders and implied undertakings), and risk of prejudicial publication of possibly inadmissible material—weighed more heavily than the applicants' public interest and open justice claims.
Court Disposition
Access to the applications and affidavits sought by Allied Press and Fairfax Media declined
Orders
- Access to the applications and affidavits filed in support of and in opposition to the defendants' substantive applications is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment