COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE V JP GOLLAN AS TRUSTEE IN THE GOLLAN FAMILY TRUST HC HAM CIV 2011-419-84
The Court found the jurisdictional requirements under Insolvency Act ss13 and 36 were met and the debtor failed to establish grounds under s37 to refuse adjudication: the debt is admitted and unpaid, the debtor is again trustee of the liable trust, disclosure is incomplete, and the trading of assets and speculative...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-a8e1fc4c_6781_455c_9c8c_505728632108.pdf
- Parties
- Judgment Creditor: Commissioner of Inland Revenue; Judgment Debtor: James Patrick Gollan as trustee in the Gollan Family Trust; Creditor in Support: Creditor in support (CIV2011-419-1002)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Adjudication Order (bankruptcy) / Hearing Adjourned to 19 March 2012 Pending Payment Undertakings
- Outcome
- Proceeding adjourned to 10am on 19 March 2012 to allow debtor to make payment undertakings; if payments are not made adjudication likely to be entered
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication, Act of Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Notice, Discretion to Refuse Adjudication (s37), Relief Under Trustee Act S73, GST Liability, Official Assignee Investigation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Judgment Creditor
James Patrick Gollan as trustee in the Gollan Family Trust
Judgment Debtor
Creditor in support (CIV2011-419-1002)
Creditor in Support
Procedural Posture
Application for Adjudication Order (bankruptcy) / Hearing Adjourned to 19 March 2012 Pending Payment Undertakings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether jurisdictional requirements under Insolvency Act 2006 ss 13 and 36 are met
- 2 Whether the Court should exercise its discretion under s 37 to refuse adjudication (including on grounds under Trustee Act s73)
- 3 Whether the debtor is able to pay his debts or whether it is just and equitable to refuse adjudication
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the jurisdictional requirements under Insolvency Act ss13 and 36 were met and the debtor failed to establish grounds under s37 to refuse adjudication: the debt is admitted and unpaid, the debtor is again trustee of the liable trust, disclosure is incomplete, and the trading of assets and speculative funding justify Official Assignee supervision. Consequently the Court adjourned to allow the debtor to pay the undertaken sums but indicated that, absent payment, adjudication would likely be made on 19 March 2012.
Court Disposition
Proceeding adjourned to 10am on 19 March 2012 to allow debtor to make payment undertakings; if payments are not made adjudication likely to be entered
Orders
- Proceeding adjourned to bankruptcy list at 10am on 19 March 2012
- Debtor orally undertakes to pay $164,475.15 to Commissioner of Inland Revenue from incoming funds and $16,542.82 to creditor in CIV2011-419-1002; payments to be made as received
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment