McELHINNEY and GRENFELL v WIRECARD NZ LTD [2020] NZHC 2312
The court granted the requested extensions because the administrators demonstrated a genuine commercial need for additional time to complete an orderly going-concern sale involving multiple overseas bidders and parallel Australian proceedings, thereby justifying extensions of the convening period to 30 October 2020 and the statutory termination period to 6 November 2020 to avoid personal liability for wages; the court also directed that the watershed creditors' meeting may be conducted by video conference given overseas creditors and COVID-19 related practicalities, subject to measures ensuring participation and publicity.
- Citation
- [2020] NZHC 2312
- Parties
- Applicant; Administrator of Wirecard NZ Limited: Conor John McElhinney; Applicant; Administrator of Wirecard NZ Limited: Andrew John Grenfell; Respondent; Company in Administration: Wirecard NZ Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 4 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Companies Act 1993 Part 15 a (administration) for Extensions and Directions / Judgment on Application (on the Papers) Granting Extensions and Directions
- Outcome
- Application granted in part: convening period extended to 30 October 2020; statutory termination period under s239Y extended to 6 November 2020; watershed creditors' meeting may be conducted by video conference subject to conditions; publicity and document access orders made; costs treated as administration expenses.
- Legal Topics
- Administration, Extension of Convening Period, Statutory Termination Period for Employees, Creditors' Meeting Procedures, Video Conference Meeting Directions, Administrator Liability for Wages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Conor John McElhinney
Applicant; Administrator of Wirecard NZ Limited
Andrew John Grenfell
Applicant; Administrator of Wirecard NZ Limited
Wirecard NZ Limited
Respondent; Company in Administration
Procedural Posture
Application Under Companies Act 1993 Part 15 a (administration) for Extensions and Directions / Judgment on Application (on the Papers) Granting Extensions and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the convening period under s239AT/s239AD should be extended
- 2 Whether the statutory 14-day termination period under s239Y should be extended to avoid administrators' personal liability for wages
- 3 Whether the watershed creditors' meeting under Part 15A may be conducted by video conference
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted the requested extensions because the administrators demonstrated a genuine commercial need for additional time to complete an orderly going-concern sale involving multiple overseas bidders and parallel Australian proceedings, thereby justifying extensions of the convening period to 30 October 2020 and the statutory termination period to 6 November 2020 to avoid personal liability for wages; the court also directed that the watershed creditors' meeting may be conducted by video conference given overseas creditors and COVID-19 related practicalities, subject to measures ensuring participation and publicity.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part: convening period extended to 30 October 2020; statutory termination period under s239Y extended to 6 November 2020; watershed creditors' meeting may be conducted by video conference subject to conditions; publicity and document access orders made; costs treated as administration expenses.
Orders
- Convening period under s239AT/s239AD extended to 30 October 2020
- Statutory termination period under s239Y extended to 6 November 2020
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment