AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED v NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS AND RELATED TRADES UNION INCORPORATED AND ORS [2017] NZSC 30

AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED v NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS AND RELATED TRADES UNION INCORPORATED AND ORS [2017] NZSC 30

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and formulated a single approved question for full argument: whether the Court of Appeal was correct to find that a breach of s 82 occurred when the employer required seasonal workers to enter new individual employment agreements for the 2015/2016 season. The Court did not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] NZSC 30
Parties
Applicant: AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED; First Respondent: NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS AND RELATED TRADES UNION INCORPORATED; Second Respondents: ROBERTA KEREWAI RATU AND OTHERS
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
9 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court / Leave to Appeal Granted; Question Approved for Full Hearing
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; approved question set for full hearing
Legal Topics
Breach of S 82 Employment Relations Act 2000, Individual Employment Agreements, Seasonal Workers
Employment Law Labour Law Statutory Interpretation Breach of S 82 Employment Relations Act 2000 Individual Employment Agreements Seasonal Workers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED

Applicant

NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS AND RELATED TRADES UNION INCORPORATED

First Respondent

ROBERTA KEREWAI RATU AND OTHERS

Second Respondents

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court / Leave to Appeal Granted; Question Approved for Full Hearing

  1. 1 Whether a breach of s 82 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 occurred when the employer required seasonal workers to enter new individual employment agreements before commencing work for the 2015/2016 season

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and formulated a single approved question for full argument: whether the Court of Appeal was correct to find that a breach of s 82 occurred when the employer required seasonal workers to enter new individual employment agreements for the 2015/2016 season. The Court did not decide the substantive s 82 issue at leave stage.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; approved question set for full hearing

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Approved question: whether the Court of Appeal was correct to find that a breach of s 82 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 had occurred when the applicant required seasonal workers to enter into new individual employment agreements before commencing work for the 2015/2016 season