AJD v SED [2013] NZHC 3154
The judge's factual finding of psychological abuse was supported by repeated abusive posts and related conduct; given the pattern of behaviour, breach of a prior undertaking, proximity of residences and unresolved relationship property tensions an objective assessment justified a reasonable fear of future psychological abuse and therefore a protection order was necessary under s14.
- Citation
- [2013] NZHC 3154
- Parties
- Appellant: AJD; Respondent: SED
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Domestic Violence Act Appeal / High Court Appeal Against Family Court Final Protection Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Protection Order, Psychological Abuse, Necessity Test Under S14, Appeal Standard of Review, Undertakings and Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AJD
Appellant
SED
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domestic Violence Act Appeal / High Court Appeal Against Family Court Final Protection Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant's conduct constituted domestic violence (psychological abuse) under s3 of the Domestic Violence Act 1995
- 2 Whether the respondent's subjective fear of future abuse was reasonable and whether a protection order was necessary under s14
- 3 Whether the Family Court judge misapplied legal principles (Surrey v Surrey) or erred in the exercise of discretion
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's factual finding of psychological abuse was supported by repeated abusive posts and related conduct; given the pattern of behaviour, breach of a prior undertaking, proximity of residences and unresolved relationship property tensions an objective assessment justified a reasonable fear of future psychological abuse and therefore a protection order was necessary under s14.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Final protection order of the Family Court affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment