JURAN V QUINN COA CA315/2012

JURAN V QUINN COA CA315/2012

The appeal is allowed because the parties filed a joint memorandum confirming settlement and requesting consent orders; accordingly the Court quashed the High Court judgment and set aside the bankruptcy notice and made no order as to costs.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
COA CA315/2012
Parties
Appellant: Alen Valentin Juran; Respondent: Gerrard Stephen Quinn
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
3 August 2012
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On the Papers (consent Orders)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court judgment quashed; bankruptcy notice set aside; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Bankruptcy Notice, Setting Aside Judgment, Consent Orders, Costs
Bankruptcy/insolvency Civil Procedure Bankruptcy Notice Setting Aside Judgment Consent Orders Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alen Valentin Juran

Appellant

Gerrard Stephen Quinn

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / On the Papers (consent Orders)

  1. 1 Whether the High Court judgment refusing to set aside a bankruptcy notice should be quashed
  2. 2 Whether the bankruptcy notice issued 27 February 2012 should be set aside by consent

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is allowed because the parties filed a joint memorandum confirming settlement and requesting consent orders; accordingly the Court quashed the High Court judgment and set aside the bankruptcy notice and made no order as to costs.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court judgment quashed; bankruptcy notice set aside; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed.
  • The judgment of the High Court delivered on 3 May 2012 is quashed.