FUNNELL V NORTHLAND REGION CORRECTIONS FACILITY HC WHA CIV-2010-488-748
The application for a writ of habeas corpus was dismissed because the applicant withdrew the application and the detention was pursuant to a valid warrant of commitment, therefore no writ could properly be issued.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-ca5e14aa_dd77_4201_b2af_3474e2c76a88.pdf
- Parties
- Applicant: Allan Funnell; Respondent: The Superintendent of Northland Region Corrections Facility
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Habeas Corpus Application / Dismissed at Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Habeas Corpus, Detention, Bail
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allan Funnell
Applicant
The Superintendent of Northland Region Corrections Facility
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Habeas Corpus Application / Dismissed at Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a writ of habeas corpus could properly be issued given the warrant of commitment
- 2 Whether the applicant had abandoned or discontinued the habeas corpus application
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a writ of habeas corpus was dismissed because the applicant withdrew the application and the detention was pursuant to a valid warrant of commitment, therefore no writ could properly be issued.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for writ of habeas corpus dismissed.
- No order as to costs; dismissal without prejudice to any bail application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
FUNNELL V NORTHLAND REGION CORRECTIONS FACILITY HC WHA CIV-2010-488-748 29 November 2010IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WHANGAREI REGISTRY CIV-2010-488-748BETWEEN ALLAN FUNNELL Applicant AND THE SUPERINTENDENT OF NORTHLAND REGION CORRECTIONS FACILITY Respondent Hearing: 29 November 2010 Appearances: G R Anson for the Applicant M B Smith for the Respondent Judgment: 29 November 2010JUDGMENT OF PETERS J.[1] This morning Mr Anson for the Applicant and Mr Smith for the Respondent appeared before me in respect of an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the Applicant and dated 24 November 2010. [2] Counsel for the Applicant advised me that the Applicant had decided not to pursue the application. A warrant of commitment on adjournment was issued by District Court Judge Everitt at the Kaitaia District Court on 10 September 2010 and it is pursuant to that warrant that the Applicant is presently detained at the Northern Region Corrections Facility. [3] Given that, no writ of habeas corpus could properly be issued. The application is dismissed.[4] Counsel for the Applicant notes that this is without prejudice to any bail application that the Applicant may make, which of course he is free to do. [5] No order is sought as to costs. ...........................................PETERS JSolicitors: Crown Solicitor, PO Box 146 Whangarei 0140 Email: Michaels@mwis.co.nz Counsel: Grant R Anson, P O Box 248 Kerikeri 0245 Email: nil-desp@xtra.co.nz