BAILEY v CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL [2013] NZHC 1486

BAILEY v CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL [2013] NZHC 1486

The Court concluded that, despite doubt about the availability of full efficacious relief given the extent of construction, there was an arguable public law error and the balance favoured preserving the status quo; accordingly interim orders under the Court's remedial powers were justified to restrain further...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] NZHC 1486
Parties
Applicant: Andrew John Bailey; Respondent: Christchurch City Council
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
19 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Interim Application / Interim Relief and Case Management
Outcome
Interim relief granted; costs reserved; matter to be actively case managed and fixture sought for substantive hearing
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Interim Relief, Consultation and Objections Under Local Government Act 2002, Public Works on Private Property
Administrative Law Local Government Law Civil Procedure Judicial Review Interim Relief Consultation and Objections Under Local Government Act 2002 Public Works on Private Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew John Bailey

Applicant

Christchurch City Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Interim Application / Interim Relief and Case Management

  1. 1 Whether the Council failed to consult or confer with affected property owners under the Local Government Act 2002
  2. 2 Whether effective or efficacious relief is available given the new sewer system is largely constructed
  3. 3 Whether interim relief should be granted under the Court's powers to preserve the status quo pending full hearing

Ratio Decidendi

The Court concluded that, despite doubt about the availability of full efficacious relief given the extent of construction, there was an arguable public law error and the balance favoured preserving the status quo; accordingly interim orders under the Court's remedial powers were justified to restrain further installation on private land of objecting owners and to prevent disconnection of the applicant's existing gravity system pending the substantive judicial review.

Court Disposition

Interim relief granted; costs reserved; matter to be actively case managed and fixture sought for substantive hearing

Orders

  • Council is restrained from carrying out further work installing the pressurised sewer system on private land of owners who serve or continue to serve objections in PS8 pursuant to Schedule 12 of the Local Government Act 2002 until Mr Bailey's judicial review is determined
  • Council must not take steps to prevent use of the existing gravity waste system connected to Mr Bailey's property until Mr Bailey's judicial review is determined