AUCKLAND CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP AND RECREATIONS v THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE [2020] NZHC 2224

AUCKLAND CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP AND RECREATIONS v THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE [2020] NZHC 2224

Because the appellant failed to appear on two occasions after unsuccessfully seeking non-lawyer representation and filed no opposition to the costs application, the Court exercised its discretion to award the Commissioner costs on a 2B basis in the sum claimed and disbursements, totaling $5,242.65.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] NZHC 2224
Parties
Appellant: Auckland Christian Fellowship and Recreations; Respondent: Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
28 August 2020
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal Under S26 a Taxation Review Authorities Act 1994 Concerning GST / Costs Application After Appeal Was Struck Out
Outcome
Court ordered the appellant to pay the Commissioner's costs and disbursements following strike out of the appeal.
Legal Topics
Goods and Services Tax, Costs, Representation, Strike Out
Tax Law Civil Procedure Costs Law Goods and Services Tax Costs Representation Strike Out

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Auckland Christian Fellowship and Recreations

Appellant

Commissioner of Inland Revenue

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal Under S26 a Taxation Review Authorities Act 1994 Concerning GST / Costs Application After Appeal Was Struck Out

  1. 1 Whether the Commissioner was entitled to costs following the appellant's failure to appear
  2. 2 Appropriate quantum of costs and disbursements to award
  3. 3 Whether non-lawyer representation application affected costs entitlement

Ratio Decidendi

Because the appellant failed to appear on two occasions after unsuccessfully seeking non-lawyer representation and filed no opposition to the costs application, the Court exercised its discretion to award the Commissioner costs on a 2B basis in the sum claimed and disbursements, totaling $5,242.65.

Court Disposition

Court ordered the appellant to pay the Commissioner's costs and disbursements following strike out of the appeal.

Orders

  • Appellant to pay costs to the Commissioner on a 2B basis in the sum of 4,063.00 NZD
  • Appellant to pay disbursements to the Commissioner in the sum of 1,179.65 NZD