RJ & MH MCVITTY AND ORS V BANK OF NEW ZEALAND LIMITED AND ANOR HC WN CIV-2010-485-1164
The strike-out application was dismissed because the documentary and solicitor evidence established that both directors (including Garrity via solicitor confirmation) authorised PDL to commence proceedings; however the receivers' stay application succeeded in part because the court was not satisfied the indemnities...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-81c5d9ca_9818_4400_bc82_58cc53b2228d.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiffs: Robert Julian McVitty and Margaret Helen McVitty; Second Plaintiffs: Robert Julian McVitty and Margaret Helen McVitty as Trustees of the R J McVitty Trust; Third Plaintiff: McVitty Properties Limited (in receivership); Fourth Plaintiff: Patoka Dairies Limited (in receivership); First Defendant: Bank of New Zealand Limited; Second Defendants (as Receivers): Maurice George Noone and John Howard Ross Fisk
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Litigation / Interlocutory Applications (strike Out and Stay)
- Outcome
- Receivers' strike-out application dismissed; receivers' application to stay MPL and PDL causes of action granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Authority to Commence Proceedings, Strike Out, Stay, Security for Costs, Indemnity for Costs, Receivers' Duties, Abuse of Process, Directors' Residual Powers
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Julian McVitty and Margaret Helen McVitty
First Plaintiffs
Robert Julian McVitty and Margaret Helen McVitty as Trustees of the R J McVitty Trust
Second Plaintiffs
McVitty Properties Limited (in receivership)
Third Plaintiff
Patoka Dairies Limited (in receivership)
Fourth Plaintiff
Bank of New Zealand Limited
First Defendant
Maurice George Noone and John Howard Ross Fisk
Second Defendants (as Receivers)
Procedural Posture
Civil Litigation / Interlocutory Applications (strike Out and Stay)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Patoka Dairies Limited (PDL) was properly authorised by its directors to commence proceedings
- 2 Whether the receivers could strike out PDL as a plaintiff as an abuse or mistake in joinder
- 3 Whether the causes of action by PDL and McVitty Properties Limited (MPL) should be stayed pending satisfactory indemnity or security
Ratio Decidendi
The strike-out application was dismissed because the documentary and solicitor evidence established that both directors (including Garrity via solicitor confirmation) authorised PDL to commence proceedings; however the receivers' stay application succeeded in part because the court was not satisfied the indemnities were demonstrably adequate and therefore stayed PDL's and MPL's causes of action until Mr McVitty provides (1) a signed indemnity, (2) a verified statement of personal assets and liabilities satisfactory to receivers and the Court, and (3) security in an amount and on terms satisfactory to the Court.
Court Disposition
Receivers' strike-out application dismissed; receivers' application to stay MPL and PDL causes of action granted in part
Orders
- Stay the causes of action brought by PDL and by MPL until: (i) Mr McVitty provides a signed indemnity to PDL and MPL for all costs and liabilities arising from this proceeding; (ii) Mr McVitty provides a statement of his personal assets and liabilities verified by statutory declaration to the reasonable satisfaction...
- Leave granted to the receivers, to Mr McVitty and to the plaintiffs to apply to the Court on no less than three days' notice in relation to any issues arising out of this decision or the subject matter of this application
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment