BANK OF NEW ZEALAND V KHAN & ORS HC AK CIV-2012-404-1099
The court found the parties had agreed to service by email under r 6.7, and on the evidence entered judgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants for $2,900,023.27 plus interest of $73,402.00 and against the third defendants (trustees) for $2,245,452.43 plus interest of $53,873; costs and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-c6214c3c_9d99_4f44_b403_76908c2422ac.pdf
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Bank of New Zealand; First Defendant: Mohammed Hashim Khan; Second Defendant: Mukhtar Jahan Khan; Third Defendant: Mohammed Hashim Khan and Mukhtar Jahan Khan as Trustees of the Hashim Khan Family Trust
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 3 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (debt) / Judgment (oral)
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for plaintiff against defendants as set out in the orders below.
- Legal Topics
- Service by Email, Judgment for Debt, Interest, Costs and Disbursements, Liability of Trustees
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bank of New Zealand
Plaintiff
Mohammed Hashim Khan
First Defendant
Mukhtar Jahan Khan
Second Defendant
Mohammed Hashim Khan and Mukhtar Jahan Khan as Trustees of the Hashim Khan Family Trust
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (debt) / Judgment (oral)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was an agreement to serve by email under r 6.7
- 2 Whether plaintiff was entitled to judgment for the claimed sums and interest
- 3 Whether the third defendants (trustees) were liable for the trust debt
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the parties had agreed to service by email under r 6.7, and on the evidence entered judgment for the plaintiff against the first and second defendants for $2,900,023.27 plus interest of $73,402.00 and against the third defendants (trustees) for $2,245,452.43 plus interest of $53,873; costs and disbursements were awarded.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for plaintiff against defendants as set out in the orders below.
Orders
- Service by email validated pursuant to High Court Rules r 6.7.
- Judgment against the first and second defendants in the sum of $2,900,023.27 together with interest down to today's date in the sum of $73,402.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
BANK OF NEW ZEALAND V KHAN & ORS HC AK CIV-2012-404-1099 [3 May 2012]IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALANDAUCKLAND REGISTRYCIV-2012-404-1099[2012] NZHC 935BETWEEN BANK OF NEW ZEALANDPlaintiffAND MOHAMMED HASHIM KHANFirst DefendantAND MUKHTAR JAHAN KHANSecond DefendantAND MOHAMMED HASHIM KHAN ANDMUKHTAR JAHAN KHAN ASTRUSTEES OF THE HASHIM KHANFAMILY TRUSTThird DefendantsHearing: 3 May 2012Appearances: Ms J Phillips for PlaintiffNo appearance for DefendantsJudgment: 3 May 2012ORAL JUDGMENT OF ASSOCIATE JUDGE DOOGUESolicitors:Buddle Findlay, P O Box 1433, Auckland – Jessica.phillips@buddlefindlay.com/scott.barker@buddlefindlay.comCopy:Mr M H Khan – via email: moshims@xtra.co.nz[1] I am satisfied that there has been an agreement to serve by email in terms of r 6.7.[2] There will be judgment against the first and second defendants in the sum of$2,900,023.27 together with interest down to today's date in the sum of $73,402.00.[3] There will be judgment against the third defendants in the sum of $2,245,452.43 together with interest down to 3 May 2012 of $53,873. As well, the defendants will pay costs in the sum of $4,741.60 and disbursements of $1,537.52 and the total is $6,279.12._____________J.P. DoogueAssociate Judge