NEEDHAM & ANOR v MCKEE [2015] NZHC 2743

NEEDHAM & ANOR v MCKEE [2015] NZHC 2743

Because the respondent was medically certified as severely demented and incapable of executing transfer documents, and the factual circumstances matched prior authority (Kohn v Kohn), the Court granted leave to proceed by originating application, dispensed service due to incapacity, and made a vesting order under s...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] NZHC 2743
Parties
Applicant Trustee: Rodney Arthur Needham; Applicant Trustee: David Stewart Lee; Respondent: Barbara Catherine Agnes McKee
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
6 November 2015
Procedural Posture
Trusts/property Application Under Trustee Act 1956 / Application Determined on the Papers; Judgment and Vesting Order Issued
Outcome
Leave granted; service dispensed; vesting order made under s 52(1)(b)(i) Trustee Act 1956.
Legal Topics
Vesting Order, Trustee Removal and Replacement, Incapacity and Representation, Service Dispensed, Trustee Act 1956 S 52(1)(b)(i)
Trusts Property Civil Procedure Capacity/mental Health Equity Vesting Order Trustee Removal and Replacement Incapacity and Representation +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rodney Arthur Needham

Applicant Trustee

David Stewart Lee

Applicant Trustee

Barbara Catherine Agnes McKee

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Trusts/property Application Under Trustee Act 1956 / Application Determined on the Papers; Judgment and Vesting Order Issued

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to commence proceedings by originating application under High Court Rules r 19.5
  2. 2 Whether service may be dispensed on an incapacitated respondent under High Court Rules rr 19.10, 7.22 and r 4.40
  3. 3 Whether the Court should make a vesting order under s 52(1)(b)(i) Trustee Act 1956 to vest trust land in continuing/retiring trustees

Ratio Decidendi

Because the respondent was medically certified as severely demented and incapable of executing transfer documents, and the factual circumstances matched prior authority (Kohn v Kohn), the Court granted leave to proceed by originating application, dispensed service due to incapacity, and made a vesting order under s 52(1)(b)(i) Trustee Act 1956 vesting the specified land in the applicants as continuing trustees to enable compliance with LINZ transfer requirements.

Court Disposition

Leave granted; service dispensed; vesting order made under s 52(1)(b)(i) Trustee Act 1956.

Orders

  • Service of the proceedings on the respondent is dispensed with due to her incapacity.
  • A vesting order under s 52(1)(b)(i) Trustee Act 1956 is granted vesting the land contained in Certificates of Title SA41C/967 and SA64C/220 (225A Ngatai Road, Tauranga and 16A Monarch Grove, Pauanui Beach) in the applicants as the continuing trustees.