BECA CARTER HOLLINGS & FERNER LIMITED v WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL [2023] NZSC 38 [21 April 2023]

BECA CARTER HOLLINGS & FERNER LIMITED v WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL [2023] NZSC 38 [21 April 2023]

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and framed the determinative question as whether the Court of Appeal was right to conclude that the Building Act longstop provisions do not apply to a contribution claim.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] NZSC 38
Parties
Applicant: Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Limited; Respondent: Wellington City Council
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
24 April 2023
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court / Leave Granted; Question Approved
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; question approved for hearing
Legal Topics
Building Act Longstop Provisions, Contribution Claims, Appeal on Question of Law
Building Law Statutory Interpretation Civil Procedure Building Act Longstop Provisions Contribution Claims Appeal on Question of Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Beca Carter Hollings & Ferner Limited

Applicant

Wellington City Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court / Leave Granted; Question Approved

  1. 1 Whether the Building Act longstop provisions apply to a contribution claim

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and framed the determinative question as whether the Court of Appeal was right to conclude that the Building Act longstop provisions do not apply to a contribution claim.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; question approved for hearing

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted
  • Approved question: whether the Court of Appeal was right to conclude that the Building Act longstop provisions do not apply to a contribution claim