R v WALKER [2015] NZHC 3214
Applying Taueki by analogy the offending fell squarely in band three due to frenzied repeated stabbing with a knife, serious life-threatening injuries and planning to lure the victim; starting point set at 10 years, uplifted six months for extensive prior violent convictions, reduced by 10% for the offender's psychological condition (not for remorse), and a minimum period imposed because of premeditation, lack of genuine remorse, high risk of reoffending and need for denunciation and protection, resulting in a global sentence of 9 years 6 months with a minimum of 4 years 9 months imprisonment.
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 3214
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Benjamin Walker
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Attempted Murder / Sentencing After Jury Trial
- Outcome
- Sentence of imprisonment imposed following jury conviction for attempted murder
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Sentencing Principles, Minimum Period of Imprisonment, Taueki Bands, Mitigation for Mental Health, Victim Impact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Benjamin Walker
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Attempted Murder / Sentencing After Jury Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate starting point for attempted murder by analogy to Taueki
- 2 Whether aggravating factors (premeditation, weapon, serious injury, intent to kill) justify uplift
- 3 Whether offender's psychological condition mitigates culpability
Ratio Decidendi
Applying Taueki by analogy the offending fell squarely in band three due to frenzied repeated stabbing with a knife, serious life-threatening injuries and planning to lure the victim; starting point set at 10 years, uplifted six months for extensive prior violent convictions, reduced by 10% for the offender's psychological condition (not for remorse), and a minimum period imposed because of premeditation, lack of genuine remorse, high risk of reoffending and need for denunciation and protection, resulting in a global sentence of 9 years 6 months with a minimum of 4 years 9 months imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Sentence of imprisonment imposed following jury conviction for attempted murder
Orders
- Sentence: 9 years 6 months imprisonment
- Minimum period: 4 years 9 months imprisonment before Parole Board consideration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment