BODY CORPORATE 167041 v SUE & ORS [2015] NZHC 2670
The Court approved the s 74 reinstatement scheme because the building was demonstrably damaged, the draft scheme was appropriate and supported by evidence and a body corporate resolution, there was no opposition from respondents, and undertaking the works as a single, managed project was necessary and efficient.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] NZHC 2670
- Parties
- Applicant: Body Corporate 167041 (North Auckland Registry); Respondent: Stanley Sue, Ada Sue and Franklin Law Trustee Limited & Others (First to Twenty-fourth Respondents)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Application Under the Unit Titles Act 2010 / Judgment on Application to Establish Reinstatement Scheme Under S 74
- Outcome
- Order approving scheme under s 74 of the Unit Titles Act 2010
- Legal Topics
- Reinstatement Scheme, Remedial Work, Levies and Apportionment, Weather Tightness Defects, Moisture Ingress
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Body Corporate 167041 (North Auckland Registry)
Applicant
Stanley Sue, Ada Sue and Franklin Law Trustee Limited & Others (First to Twenty-fourth Respondents)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Application Under the Unit Titles Act 2010 / Judgment on Application to Establish Reinstatement Scheme Under S 74
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a scheme under s 74 of the Unit Titles Act 2010 should be approved to fund and manage remediation
- 2 Whether the remedial works affecting common property and unit property should be undertaken as a single project
- 3 Whether procedural requirements and owner consent/notification were satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the s 74 reinstatement scheme because the building was demonstrably damaged, the draft scheme was appropriate and supported by evidence and a body corporate resolution, there was no opposition from respondents, and undertaking the works as a single, managed project was necessary and efficient.
Court Disposition
Order approving scheme under s 74 of the Unit Titles Act 2010
Orders
- Order approving the draft reinstatement scheme in the terms of the draft order attached to the originating application dated 23 July 2015
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
BODY CORPORATE 167041 v SUE & ORS [2015] NZHC 2670 [30 October 2015]IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALANDAUCKLAND REGISTRYCIV-2015-404-001698[2015] NZHC 2670UNDER the Unit Titles Act 2010IN THE MATTER OF an originating application for ordersestablishing a scheme under s 74 of theUnit Titles Act 2010BETWEEN BODY CORPORATE 167041 (NORTHAUCKLAND REGISTRY)ApplicantAND STANLEY SUE, ADA SUE ANDFRANKLIN LAW TRUSTEE LIMITED& OTHERSFirst to Twenty-fourth RespondentsHearing: 29 October 2015Appearances: C R Eric for ApplicantsNo appearance for RespondentsJudgment: 30 October 2015JUDGMENT OF COURTNEY JThis judgment was delivered by Justice Courtneyon 30 October 2015 at 11.30 ampursuant to R 11.5 of the High Court RulesRegistrar / Deputy RegistrarDate[1] In this originating application the Body Corporate of a residential development in Mount Eden (Eden Oaks) seeks orders establishing a scheme under s 74 of the Unit Titles Act 2010. The building (principal units, accessory units and common property) have all suffered significant damage caused by moisture ingress and require remedial work. The respondents are the various unit owners. They do not oppose the application. The matter has been traversed fully at Body Corporate meetings and at an extraordinary general meeting on 17 June 2015 at which a resolution was passed approving the draft reinstatement plan that had been circulated prior to the meeting and authorising the Body Corporate to make this application.[2] The application is supported by affidavits from Martin John Hill, a chartered building surveyor, Jacqueline Anne Bree, the Body Corporate chairperson at the time the application was filed, and Deborah Sue, the current Body Corporate chairperson. In her affidavit Ms Bree has described the early identification of weather-tightness issues at the Eden Oaks development and engagement of building consultants, who recommended remedial work including a complete re-clad of the east and south elevations with a cavity system to replace the damaged timber framing, fire rated linings and new structural supports. Those steps were undertaken in 2009 and 2010. Subsequently, the Body Corporate considered various options for the remedial work which, by 2014, had expanded to include work to ensure the structural safety of the balconies.[3] In 2014 the Body Corporate began to discuss the need for a reinstatement scheme under s 74 of the Unit Titles Act 2010 and that resulted in the draft scheme being circulated to all owners in June 2015 in advance of the extraordinary general meeting to be held on 17 June 2015. The details of the proposed remedial work aredescribed in Ms Bree's affidavit. At the extraordinary general meeting 15 of the 20 principal owners were either present or represented by proxy. They all supported the funding of the remedial works on the basis of levies under which each owner would be required to contribute a share equivalent to his or her utility interest.[4] The respondents are the unit owners, four mortgagees and the BodyCorporate's insurer. All have been served along with the District Land Registrar. No respondent has signalled any opposition. No notices of opposition have been served.The only respondent to take any steps is Westpac NZ Ltd which has advised the Court by memorandum that it neither consented to nor opposed the application andwould abide the Court's decision. Moreover, the owners of all 20 units have taken steps to facilitate the remedial works, including entering into service agreements, paying levies and giving notice to tenants.[5] I am satisfied that the building has been damaged, that a scheme under s 74 is the appropriate means of effecting remediation of the damage and that the proposed draft scheme is an appropriate one. Remedial work required will affect the whole complex including common property and interconnected unit property and is best undertaken as a single project to ensure that the work can be properly managed and undertaken as efficiently as possible. I therefore make an order approving a scheme under s 74 of the Unit Titles Act 2010 in the terms of the draft order attached to the originating application dated 23 July 2015.____________________P Courtney J