BODY CORPORATE 167041 v SUE & ORS [2015] NZHC 2670

BODY CORPORATE 167041 v SUE & ORS [2015] NZHC 2670

The Court approved the s 74 reinstatement scheme because the building was demonstrably damaged, the draft scheme was appropriate and supported by evidence and a body corporate resolution, there was no opposition from respondents, and undertaking the works as a single, managed project was necessary and efficient.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] NZHC 2670
Parties
Applicant: Body Corporate 167041 (North Auckland Registry); Respondent: Stanley Sue, Ada Sue and Franklin Law Trustee Limited & Others (First to Twenty-fourth Respondents)
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
30 October 2015
Procedural Posture
Originating Application Under the Unit Titles Act 2010 / Judgment on Application to Establish Reinstatement Scheme Under S 74
Outcome
Order approving scheme under s 74 of the Unit Titles Act 2010
Legal Topics
Reinstatement Scheme, Remedial Work, Levies and Apportionment, Weather Tightness Defects, Moisture Ingress
Property Law Unit Titles Act Matters Construction Law Civil Procedure Reinstatement Scheme Remedial Work Levies and Apportionment Weather Tightness Defects +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Body Corporate 167041 (North Auckland Registry)

Applicant

Stanley Sue, Ada Sue and Franklin Law Trustee Limited & Others (First to Twenty-fourth Respondents)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Originating Application Under the Unit Titles Act 2010 / Judgment on Application to Establish Reinstatement Scheme Under S 74

  1. 1 Whether a scheme under s 74 of the Unit Titles Act 2010 should be approved to fund and manage remediation
  2. 2 Whether the remedial works affecting common property and unit property should be undertaken as a single project
  3. 3 Whether procedural requirements and owner consent/notification were satisfied

Ratio Decidendi

The Court approved the s 74 reinstatement scheme because the building was demonstrably damaged, the draft scheme was appropriate and supported by evidence and a body corporate resolution, there was no opposition from respondents, and undertaking the works as a single, managed project was necessary and efficient.

Court Disposition

Order approving scheme under s 74 of the Unit Titles Act 2010

Orders

  • Order approving the draft reinstatement scheme in the terms of the draft order attached to the originating application dated 23 July 2015