MARCHAND, MARCHAND AND COSTELLOE v JACKSON & ANOR HC CHCH CIV 2011-409-810
The broker breached his contractual duties by failing to procure the house and contents insurance, by assuring the plaintiffs that cover was in place and by not informing or properly advising them after becoming aware of the MAS cancellation and Dr Marchand's convictions; on the balance of probabilities the plaintiffs would have disclosed the convictions and obtained the insurance sought (or equivalent) if the broker had performed his duties, so the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs to put them in the same position as if cover had been obtained; contributory negligence was not established and damages are not to be rebated.
- Citation
- openlaw-6dbf7598_dcde_4a03_a229_392b16c6b1b9.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff / Trustee: Nicola Jayne Marchand; First Plaintiff / Trustee: Jacques Renard Marchand; First Plaintiff / Trustee: Patrick Gregory Costelloe; Second Plaintiff: Nicola Jayne Marchand; Second Plaintiff: Jacques Renard Marchand; Defendant (insurance Broker): John F Jackson; Third Party: IAG New Zealand Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 2 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (insurance/contract Dispute) / Judgment on Liability (quantum Reserved)
- Outcome
- Judgment for the first plaintiffs on liability against the defendant; quantum to be determined at further hearing
- Legal Topics
- Broker Duties, Non Disclosure, Insurability, Loss of Chance, Remedies for Failed Insurance Placement, Quantum to Be Determined
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicola Jayne Marchand
First Plaintiff / Trustee
Jacques Renard Marchand
First Plaintiff / Trustee
Patrick Gregory Costelloe
First Plaintiff / Trustee
Nicola Jayne Marchand
Second Plaintiff
Jacques Renard Marchand
Second Plaintiff
John F Jackson
Defendant (insurance Broker)
IAG New Zealand Limited
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil (insurance/contract Dispute) / Judgment on Liability (quantum Reserved)
Legal Issues
- 1 What were the broker's contractual duties?
- 2 Did the broker breach those duties by failing to procure insurance and by misrepresenting cover?
- 3 If breach occurred, what loss is the broker liable for (in principle)?
Ratio Decidendi
The broker breached his contractual duties by failing to procure the house and contents insurance, by assuring the plaintiffs that cover was in place and by not informing or properly advising them after becoming aware of the MAS cancellation and Dr Marchand's convictions; on the balance of probabilities the plaintiffs would have disclosed the convictions and obtained the insurance sought (or equivalent) if the broker had performed his duties, so the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiffs to put them in the same position as if cover had been obtained; contributory negligence was not established and damages are not to be rebated.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the first plaintiffs on liability against the defendant; quantum to be determined at further hearing
Orders
- Defendant liable to the first plaintiffs for losses on the basis that insurance would have been obtained; quantum to be assessed at a further hearing
- Counsel to confer and file a joint memorandum proposing steps and timetable for quantum hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment