BROWN v R CA320/2015 [2015] NZCA 284

BROWN v R CA320/2015 [2015] NZCA 284

Leave to appeal was refused because the Court was not satisfied there were sufficiently arguable grounds to justify granting leave.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] NZCA 284
Parties
Appellant: BROWN; Respondent: THE QUEEN
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
3 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal (refused)
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Publication Prohibition, Anonymity Orders, Criminal Procedure Act 2011 S200 S203 S204
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Appeal Leave to Appeal Publication Prohibition Anonymity Orders Criminal Procedure Act 2011 S200 S203 S204

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BROWN

Appellant

THE QUEEN

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal (refused)

  1. 1 Whether to grant leave to appeal
  2. 2 Status of publication prohibition orders under Criminal Procedure Act 2011

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the Court was not satisfied there were sufficiently arguable grounds to justify granting leave.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal refused.
  • Order prohibiting publication of appellant's name, address, occupation or identifying particulars remains in force pursuant to s200 Criminal Procedure Act 2011.