GILLESPIE V GUEST HC AK CIV-2011-404-1629
Defendant failed to establish as a matter of law and on uncontested facts that he was a trustee entitled to rely conclusively on the trust deed's limitation and indemnity clauses and that the claims necessarily fall outside the irreducible core; factual disputes (appointment, capacity in which defendant acted) and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- openlaw-bc6d81d5_a217_4924_ac1a_8f6156559ecf.pdf
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Bruce James Gillespie; Plaintiff: Prudence Juliet Gillespie; Plaintiff: Christopher James Gillespie; Plaintiff: Nicholas John Gillespie; Plaintiff: Jonathan Paul Gillespie; First Defendant: Andrew John Dexter Guest; Second Defendant: Viranda Property Network Limited; First Third Party: RSM Prince & Partners; Second Third Party (discontinued): Morrison Creed; Third Third Party: Graeme Hamilton Sinclair
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 4 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (trusts/negligence/contract/fair Trading) / Interlocutory Strike Out Application (pre Trial)
- Outcome
- Strike-out application dismissed; leave granted to file a reply; further discovery ordered; case management telephone conference to be scheduled; costs awarded to plaintiffs on a category 2 basis
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Trustee Liability, Indemnity Clauses, Affirmative Defences, Appointment of Trustees, Rectification of Deed, Dishonesty Standard, Strike Out Procedure, Reply to Defence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bruce James Gillespie
Plaintiff
Prudence Juliet Gillespie
Plaintiff
Christopher James Gillespie
Plaintiff
Nicholas John Gillespie
Plaintiff
Jonathan Paul Gillespie
Plaintiff
Andrew John Dexter Guest
First Defendant
Viranda Property Network Limited
Second Defendant
RSM Prince & Partners
First Third Party
Morrison Creed
Second Third Party (discontinued)
Graeme Hamilton Sinclair
Third Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil (trusts/negligence/contract/fair Trading) / Interlocutory Strike Out Application (pre Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statement of claim discloses a reasonably arguable cause of action
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs' failure to file a reply to the affirmative defence is fatal
- 3 Whether Andrew Guest was validly appointed a trustee of the Gillespie Family Trust
Ratio Decidendi
Defendant failed to establish as a matter of law and on uncontested facts that he was a trustee entitled to rely conclusively on the trust deed's limitation and indemnity clauses and that the claims necessarily fall outside the irreducible core; factual disputes (appointment, capacity in which defendant acted) and the narrow construction of exclusion clauses mean the proceeding is not bound to fail and strike-out must be dismissed; plaintiffs given leave to reply and pursue further discovery.
Court Disposition
Strike-out application dismissed; leave granted to file a reply; further discovery ordered; case management telephone conference to be scheduled; costs awarded to plaintiffs on a category 2 basis
Orders
- Strike-out application dismissed
- Time for filing and serving a reply to the statement of defence is extended (exact time to be fixed at further case management conference)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment