C & R CONSTRUCTION LTD v TAHAROA IRONSANDS LTD & ORS [2021] NZHC 1222
Documents concerning Taharoa's arrangements for alternative earthmoving equipment are relevant to C & R's rectification claim because post‑contract conduct can illuminate the parties' mutual intention; r 8.17 permits variation where circumstances changed (abandonment of the counterclaim) and a tailored variation...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 1222
- Parties
- Plaintiff: C & R Construction Limited; First Defendant: Taharoa Ironsands Limited; Second Defendant: Wayne Sidney Coffey; First Third Party: Timothy Douglas Ross; First Third Party: Christopher Simon Ross; Second Third Party: Marshall Maine
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil — Contract Rectification With Interlocutory Discovery Disputes / Interlocutory Applications Concerning Discovery (r 8.17 Variation and Rr 8.10/8.18 Discovery)
- Outcome
- Application under r 8.17 granted in part: original category 10 removed and replaced with a narrowed category relating to Taharoa's arrangements for alternative equipment; Taharoa ordered to provide discovery of the amended category within 15 working days; C & R's discovery application under rr 8.10 and 8.18...
- Legal Topics
- Rectification, Tailored Discovery, Variation of Discovery Orders (r 8.17), Proportionality in Discovery, Admissibility of Post‑contract Conduct
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C & R Construction Limited
Plaintiff
Taharoa Ironsands Limited
First Defendant
Wayne Sidney Coffey
Second Defendant
Timothy Douglas Ross
First Third Party
Christopher Simon Ross
First Third Party
Marshall Maine
Second Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil — Contract Rectification With Interlocutory Discovery Disputes / Interlocutory Applications Concerning Discovery (r 8.17 Variation and Rr 8.10/8.18 Discovery)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether documents in category 10 remain relevant to C & R's rectification claim after Taharoa abandoned its fourth counterclaim
- 2 Whether Taharoa's r 8.17 application to remove category 10 should be granted
- 3 Whether discovery of documents concerning Taharoa's arrangements for alternative equipment is proportionate
Ratio Decidendi
Documents concerning Taharoa's arrangements for alternative earthmoving equipment are relevant to C & R's rectification claim because post‑contract conduct can illuminate the parties' mutual intention; r 8.17 permits variation where circumstances changed (abandonment of the counterclaim) and a tailored variation limited by proportionality is appropriate, so category 10 was amended rather than removed and Taharoa ordered to provide discovery of the narrowed category within a fixed time; C & R's standalone discovery application was dismissed as addressed by the r 8.17 order.
Court Disposition
Application under r 8.17 granted in part: original category 10 removed and replaced with a narrowed category relating to Taharoa's arrangements for alternative equipment; Taharoa ordered to provide discovery of the amended category within 15 working days; C & R's discovery application under rr 8.10 and 8.18...
Orders
- Original category 10 removed and replaced by: "Category 10: Taharoa's arrangements for alternative equipment: Documents in a party's control relating to any arrangements made by Taharoa to obtain access to alternative earthmoving equipment which it could use instead of equipment hired from C & R during the period of...
- Taharoa to provide discovery of the amended category 10 by way of a further affidavit of documents to be filed and served within 15 working days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment