GRANDE MEADOW DEVELOPMENTS LTD & ORS v NEW ZEALAND GENERAL REAL ESTATE LTD [2018] NZHC 680
Because the potential for harm that could not be adequately compensated by damages if certification and staged completion proceeded outweighed the limited prejudice to the respondent for the short period until the listed hearing, and because there was a reasonable possibility of the applicants' success, the Court granted a short-term interim restraint preventing the respondent applying for a s 224(c) certificate until execution of outstanding ICSAs or further order.
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 680
- Parties
- First Applicant: Grande Meadow Developments Ltd; Second Applicant: New Zealand General Real Estate Ltd; Third Applicant: Kingstone Property Ltd; Respondent: Clark Road Developments Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interim Measures Restraining S 224(c) Certificate; Property Development and Contract Dispute Pending Arbitration / Interlocutory — Interim 'interim Interim' Orders Made; Substantive Interim Hearing Listed for 30 April 2018
- Outcome
- Interim interim injunction granted restraining the respondent from applying for a s 224(c) certificate in respect of specified subdivision consents until conditions relating to ICSAs or further order are met; timetabling orders made for substantive interim hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Development Cooperation Agreements (dca), Infrastructure Cost Sharing Agreements (icsa), S 224(c) Certification Under the Resource Management Act, Staging of Subdivision Consents, Interim Relief Pending Arbitration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grande Meadow Developments Ltd
First Applicant
New Zealand General Real Estate Ltd
Second Applicant
Kingstone Property Ltd
Third Applicant
Clark Road Developments Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Measures Restraining S 224(c) Certificate; Property Development and Contract Dispute Pending Arbitration / Interlocutory — Interim 'interim Interim' Orders Made; Substantive Interim Hearing Listed for 30 April 2018
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interim relief restraining a s 224(c) certification application is available pending arbitration
- 2 Whether harm from certification is inadequately compensable by damages (irreparable harm)
- 3 Balance of convenience between applicants and respondent for short-term restraint
Ratio Decidendi
Because the potential for harm that could not be adequately compensated by damages if certification and staged completion proceeded outweighed the limited prejudice to the respondent for the short period until the listed hearing, and because there was a reasonable possibility of the applicants' success, the Court granted a short-term interim restraint preventing the respondent applying for a s 224(c) certificate until execution of outstanding ICSAs or further order.
Court Disposition
Interim interim injunction granted restraining the respondent from applying for a s 224(c) certificate in respect of specified subdivision consents until conditions relating to ICSAs or further order are met; timetabling orders made for substantive interim hearing.
Orders
- Respondent is restrained from applying to Auckland Council for a certificate issued pursuant to s 224(c) of the Resource Management Act 1991 in respect of subdivision consent SUB-60039674-A (varying LUC-2015-1698) and SUB-2016-1700 granted on 20 October 2017 until either (a) the terms of all outstanding ICSAs set...
- Hearing of application for interim orders set for 10.00 am Monday 30 April 2018 (half day fixture).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment