IN THE ESTATE OF ALBERT SUTTON TUCKER (DECEASED) [2019] NZHC 2928
The codicil is invalid on its cumulative defects (unwitnessed, reference to a prior will and introducing an uncertain forfeiture term); the forfeiture condition in clause 7 is conceptually uncertain because terms like 'De Facto, civil union, gay or lesbian, life style' do not identify with sufficient precision the event that defeats the vested gift, and accordingly that condition is void; probate of the 6 July 2016 will is granted to the applicants and the application was properly dealt with without notice because all affected parties consented.
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 2928
- Parties
- Applicant; Executor and Trustee: Robert John Park; Applicant; Executor and Trustee: Stephen Mark Connolly; Deceased: Albert Sutton Tucker; Beneficiary (grandchild): Jasmine Jayne Tucker; Beneficiary/third Party (waived Interest): The Salvation Army
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 8 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Will Validity and Probate Under Wills Act 2007 and Administration Act 1969 / On the Papers; Application for Declaration of Invalidity of Codicil, Deletion of Clause and Grant of Probate (without Notice)
- Outcome
- Codicil declared invalid; forfeiture condition in clause 7 void for uncertainty; probate granted to the applicants; application determined without notice
- Legal Topics
- Codicil Validity, Testamentary Condition Uncertainty, Forfeiture Clause, Without Notice Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert John Park
Applicant; Executor and Trustee
Stephen Mark Connolly
Applicant; Executor and Trustee
Albert Sutton Tucker
Deceased
Jasmine Jayne Tucker
Beneficiary (grandchild)
The Salvation Army
Beneficiary/third Party (waived Interest)
Procedural Posture
Will Validity and Probate Under Wills Act 2007 and Administration Act 1969 / On the Papers; Application for Declaration of Invalidity of Codicil, Deletion of Clause and Grant of Probate (without Notice)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 10 July codicil is valid (witnessing, reference to correct will, uncertainty)
- 2 Whether clause 7's forfeiture condition is void for uncertainty
- 3 Whether probate should be granted to the applicants
Ratio Decidendi
The codicil is invalid on its cumulative defects (unwitnessed, reference to a prior will and introducing an uncertain forfeiture term); the forfeiture condition in clause 7 is conceptually uncertain because terms like 'De Facto, civil union, gay or lesbian, life style' do not identify with sufficient precision the event that defeats the vested gift, and accordingly that condition is void; probate of the 6 July 2016 will is granted to the applicants and the application was properly dealt with without notice because all affected parties consented.
Court Disposition
Codicil declared invalid; forfeiture condition in clause 7 void for uncertainty; probate granted to the applicants; application determined without notice
Orders
- Codicil dated 10 July declared invalid
- The forfeiture condition in clause 7 of the will dated 6 July 2016 is void for uncertainty and deleted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment