Walker v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation

Walker v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation

Leave to appeal was granted because the central questions concerning the statutory meaning of 'earnings as an employee' and 'earnings other than as an employee' under the Act and the Earnings Definitions Regulations 1992, and whether royalties constitute earnings for abatement under section 47, are questions of law...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1999] NZACC 288
Parties
Appellant: Colin Ronald Walker; Respondent: Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
13 October 1999
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal to the High Court Under the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Act 1992 / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal (district Court)
Outcome
Leave to appeal to the High Court granted.
Legal Topics
Interpretation of 'earnings' and 'assessable Income', Abatement Under Section 47, Treatment of Royalties for Weekly Compensation, Leave to Appeal Under Section 91
Administrative Law Social Security/benefits Law Statutory Interpretation Interpretation of 'earnings' and 'assessable Income' Abatement Under Section 47 Treatment of Royalties for Weekly Compensation Leave to Appeal Under Section 91

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Colin Ronald Walker

Appellant

Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal to the High Court Under the Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Act 1992 / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal (district Court)

  1. 1 Whether the Corporation was correct to base weekly compensation entitlement on 'liable' earnings excluding royalties rather than 'assessable income' including royalties
  2. 2 Whether royalties received after commencement of incapacity for work done before incapacity constitute 'earnings' for the purposes of abatement under section 47
  3. 3 Meaning of 'earnings as an employee' and 'earnings other than as an employee' under the Act and the Earnings Definitions Regulations 1992 as applied to royalties

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was granted because the central questions concerning the statutory meaning of 'earnings as an employee' and 'earnings other than as an employee' under the Act and the Earnings Definitions Regulations 1992, and whether royalties constitute earnings for abatement under section 47, are questions of law appropriate for determination by the High Court.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal to the High Court granted.

Orders

  • Leave granted to the appellant to appeal the decision of His Honour Judge A W Middleton dated 11 June 1999 to the High Court.