THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE v HADFIELD [2021] NZHC 3506

THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE v HADFIELD [2021] NZHC 3506

On the material filed (including affidavits subsequently sworn) and given the respondent's lack of opposition and valid service, the cash was established as tainted property under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 and an assets forfeiture order was warranted; accordingly the Court made the assets forfeiture...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] NZHC 3506
Parties
Applicant: Commissioner of Police; Respondent: Aroha Rangimarie Hadfield
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
16 December 2021
Procedural Posture
Application Under Criminal Proceeds (recovery) Act 2009 / Hearing at Duty Judge List and Judgment (assets Forfeiture Application)
Outcome
Assets forfeiture order granted in respect of $90,050 cash; affidavits accepted for filing; profits forfeiture not pursued by Applicant following order.
Legal Topics
Assets Forfeiture, Tainted Property, Restraining Order, Profits Forfeiture, Admissibility of Affidavits
Criminal Law Asset Forfeiture Customs Law Civil Procedure Assets Forfeiture Tainted Property Restraining Order Profits Forfeiture +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commissioner of Police

Applicant

Aroha Rangimarie Hadfield

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under Criminal Proceeds (recovery) Act 2009 / Hearing at Duty Judge List and Judgment (assets Forfeiture Application)

  1. 1 Whether $90,050 cash recovered from respondent constituted tainted property under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009
  2. 2 Whether the Court should make an assets forfeiture order in respect of the cash
  3. 3 Whether affidavits filed unsworn could be accepted given COVID-19 constraints

Ratio Decidendi

On the material filed (including affidavits subsequently sworn) and given the respondent's lack of opposition and valid service, the cash was established as tainted property under the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act 2009 and an assets forfeiture order was warranted; accordingly the Court made the assets forfeiture order and accepted the affidavits for filing under r 9.73(4).

Court Disposition

Assets forfeiture order granted in respect of $90,050 cash; affidavits accepted for filing; profits forfeiture not pursued by Applicant following order.

Orders

  • Assets forfeiture order granted as sought in the Commissioner's application in respect of $90,050 cash
  • Affidavits accepted for filing pursuant to High Court Rules 2016 r 9.73(4)