ULRIKE GABRIELLE HEEG V CHRISTIAN OTTO ALFRED HEEG HC NEL CIV-2011-442-000129
Applicant failed to establish an arguable constructive trust interest: contemporaneous documents, joint registration, deed of acknowledgement and lengthy delay and inconsistent assertions undermine the claimed equitable interest; caveat must be removed.
- Citation
- openlaw-8e02cc55_34d1_4393_bd20_0c1918d24332.pdf
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: Ulrike Gabrielle Heeg; Defendant/respondent: Christian Otto Alfred Heeg
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Application Under Land Transfer Act 1952 S145 a (caveat) / Application to Remove/discharge Caveat Following Interim Order
- Outcome
- Application granted; caveat removed and interim order discharged; respondent awarded costs
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Caveat, Tracing of Proceeds, Lapse/discharge of Caveat
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ulrike Gabrielle Heeg
Plaintiff/applicant
Christian Otto Alfred Heeg
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Application Under Land Transfer Act 1952 S145 a (caveat) / Application to Remove/discharge Caveat Following Interim Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the caveator has an arguable equitable interest under a constructive trust in the registered land sufficient to sustain a caveat
- 2 Whether the caveat should be discharged despite any arguable interest
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant failed to establish an arguable constructive trust interest: contemporaneous documents, joint registration, deed of acknowledgement and lengthy delay and inconsistent assertions undermine the claimed equitable interest; caveat must be removed.
Court Disposition
Application granted; caveat removed and interim order discharged; respondent awarded costs
Orders
- Remove caveat 8692027.1 from Identifier 74123 (Nelson Land Registration District)
- Discharge interim order sustaining the caveat
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment