TRANSACTOR TECHNOLOGIES LTD & ANOR V MARKETSMART INTERNATIONAL (NZ) LTD & ORS HC AK CIV-2008-404-008469
The court allocated 60% of pre-9 February 2009 costs to MarketSmart NZ (reflecting Evolution's involvement) and 75% of non-party costs to Mr Harper to reflect contributions by other non-parties; held execution costs for search orders recoverable under Schedule 3 para 10.4; allowed second counsel only for the ex parte search/preservation hearing and the costs application hearing; excluded additional PwC invoice of NZD 19,282.61 and flat service charges but allowed recoverable specific disbursement items (photocopying at NZD 0.25/page and other substantiated costs); and awarded MarketSmart Pty 2B scale costs up to 24 August 2009, a 50% uplift thereafter, reduced by 50% for joint...
- Citation
- openlaw-c9ac88f2_0929_426c_87a5_90ea9555befb.pdf
- Parties
- First Applicant: Transactor Technologies Ltd; Second Applicant: Loyalty Applications NZ Limited; First Respondent: MarketSmart International (NZ) Limited; Second Respondent: Paul Gregory Harper; Third Respondent: Peter Kingsley Abotomey; Fourth Respondent: OnCard International Limited; Fifth Respondent: MarketSmart International Pty Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Litigation Costs and Non Party Costs Applications / Judgment on Costs Calculation
- Outcome
- Judgment calculating and allocating costs as specified; some disbursements excluded; MarketSmart Pty awarded scaled and uplifted costs subject to reduction for joint representation
- Legal Topics
- Costs Allocation, Non Party Costs, Search/anton Piller Orders, Disbursements, Second Counsel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Transactor Technologies Ltd
First Applicant
Loyalty Applications NZ Limited
Second Applicant
MarketSmart International (NZ) Limited
First Respondent
Paul Gregory Harper
Second Respondent
Peter Kingsley Abotomey
Third Respondent
OnCard International Limited
Fourth Respondent
MarketSmart International Pty Limited
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Litigation Costs and Non Party Costs Applications / Judgment on Costs Calculation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 2B scale costs against a non-party should be pro-rated to reflect other parties' involvement
- 2 Whether costs of executing interlocutory search orders are recoverable
- 3 Whether costs for second counsel at interlocutory hearings are recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
The court allocated 60% of pre-9 February 2009 costs to MarketSmart NZ (reflecting Evolution's involvement) and 75% of non-party costs to Mr Harper to reflect contributions by other non-parties; held execution costs for search orders recoverable under Schedule 3 para 10.4; allowed second counsel only for the ex parte search/preservation hearing and the costs application hearing; excluded additional PwC invoice of NZD 19,282.61 and flat service charges but allowed recoverable specific disbursement items (photocopying at NZD 0.25/page and other substantiated costs); and awarded MarketSmart Pty 2B scale costs up to 24 August 2009, a 50% uplift thereafter, reduced by 50% for joint...
Court Disposition
Judgment calculating and allocating costs as specified; some disbursements excluded; MarketSmart Pty awarded scaled and uplifted costs subject to reduction for joint representation
Orders
- Allocate costs and disbursements up to 9 February 2009 between Evolution and MarketSmart NZ with MarketSmart NZ to pay 60% in relation to Mr Harper's 2B award
- Allocate costs awarded against non-parties so Mr Harper bears 75% to reflect involvement of MarketSmart Pty, OnCard Limited and Mr Abotomey
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment