BODY CORPORATE 346799 v KNZ INTERNATIONAL CO LIMITED [2017] NZHC 543
The Council was entitled to recover a substantial portion of its expert fees and associated disbursements from KNZ and Multiplex on its successful cross claim, but facilitator costs for experts' conferences were not recoverable from those defendants and fees solely related to the Council's liability were excluded;...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 543
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: BODY CORPORATE 346799; Second Plaintiffs: HA THI HOANG & ORS; First Defendant: KNZ INTERNATIONAL CO LIMITED; Second Defendant: BROOKFIELD MULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS (NZ) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION); Third Defendant: FAÇADE DESIGN SERVICES LIMITED; Fourth Defendant: PBS CONTRACTING LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION); Fifth Defendant (council): AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL; Sixth Defendant: BOSTIK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Cross Claim Within Construction/building Defects Litigation / Costs Judgment Following Decision on Cross Claim (judgment Delivered 22 March 2017; Costs Detailed 24 March 2017)
- Outcome
- Judgment given for the fifth defendant (Auckland City Council) in its cross claim against the first defendant (KNZ) and the second defendant (Multiplex); costs awarded to the Council with detailed apportionment
- Legal Topics
- Costs Assessment, Apportionment of Expert Fees, Disbursements, Scale Costs, Cross Claim Liabilities
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BODY CORPORATE 346799
First Plaintiff
HA THI HOANG & ORS
Second Plaintiffs
KNZ INTERNATIONAL CO LIMITED
First Defendant
BROOKFIELD MULTIPLEX CONSTRUCTIONS (NZ) LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Second Defendant
FAÇADE DESIGN SERVICES LIMITED
Third Defendant
PBS CONTRACTING LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Fourth Defendant
AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL
Fifth Defendant (council)
BOSTIK NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Cross Claim Within Construction/building Defects Litigation / Costs Judgment Following Decision on Cross Claim (judgment Delivered 22 March 2017; Costs Detailed 24 March 2017)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether and to what extent expert fees and other disbursements incurred by the Council are recoverable from KNZ and Multiplex on the Council's successful cross claim
- 2 Appropriate apportionment of expert costs between the Council and the two defendant builders
- 3 Whether facilitator fees for experts' conferences are recoverable from KNZ and Multiplex
Ratio Decidendi
The Council was entitled to recover a substantial portion of its expert fees and associated disbursements from KNZ and Multiplex on its successful cross claim, but facilitator costs for experts' conferences were not recoverable from those defendants and fees solely related to the Council's liability were excluded; after apportionment the recoverable expert fees were fixed at $114,992.84 against each defendant and the total costs payable were fixed at $145,131.92 from KNZ and $140,463.72 from Multiplex.
Court Disposition
Judgment given for the fifth defendant (Auckland City Council) in its cross claim against the first defendant (KNZ) and the second defendant (Multiplex); costs awarded to the Council with detailed apportionment
Orders
- Auckland City Council awarded costs in respect of its successful cross claim
- KNZ INTERNATIONAL CO LIMITED ordered to pay NZD 145131.92 to Auckland City Council
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment