MY VIRTUAL HOME INTERNATIONAL LTD (IN REC) AND (IN LIQN) V NGATI TAMA CUSTODIAN TRUSTEE LTD HC AK CIV-2009-443-000548
Costs were fixed against all plaintiffs jointly and severally. The proceedings warranted Category 2 (not Category 3) and time band B. An uplift of one third (33.33%) was justified because the plaintiffs unnecessarily increased time and expense (late bundles, excessive objectionable evidence, poor presentation). Costs payable: defendants 1,3,4,5 and 6 $57,152 plus disbursements; defendant 2 $37,662.66 plus disbursements; uplift for second defendant limited to preparation time as acknowledged.
- Citation
- openlaw-1bcea0fc_36bd_4344_b417_ddb0f060b5ab.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: My Virtual Home International Ltd (in receivership and in liquidation); Second Plaintiff: Open Group Ltd; Third Plaintiff: David William Phillips; Fourth Plaintiff: MVH Group Limited; First Defendant: Ngati Tama Custodian Trustee Ltd; Second Defendant: Rodney Ivan Martin; Third Defendant: Gregory Lloyd White; Fourth Defendant: Te Runanga o Ngati Tama; Fifth Defendant: The Custodians and Elders and Trustees of the Ngati Tama iwi; Sixth Defendant: Homesoft Group Pty Ltd (previously Brisbane Software Group Pty Ltd)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (preliminary Questions; Company/insolvency and Trust Issues) / Costs Determination After Judgment on Preliminary Questions (post Judgment Fixing of Costs)
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to defendants; fixed amounts set and ordered to be paid jointly and severally by the plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Costs Fixing, Preliminary Questions, Receivership and Liquidation, Admissibility of Evidence, Representation and Withdrawal of Counsel, Costs Uplift/scale Banding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
My Virtual Home International Ltd (in receivership and in liquidation)
First Plaintiff
Open Group Ltd
Second Plaintiff
David William Phillips
Third Plaintiff
MVH Group Limited
Fourth Plaintiff
Ngati Tama Custodian Trustee Ltd
First Defendant
Rodney Ivan Martin
Second Defendant
Gregory Lloyd White
Third Defendant
Te Runanga o Ngati Tama
Fourth Defendant
The Custodians and Elders and Trustees of the Ngati Tama iwi
Fifth Defendant
Homesoft Group Pty Ltd (previously Brisbane Software Group Pty Ltd)
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (preliminary Questions; Company/insolvency and Trust Issues) / Costs Determination After Judgment on Preliminary Questions (post Judgment Fixing of Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be fixed now or reserved pending full trial
- 2 Whether all plaintiffs should be jointly and severally liable for costs despite first plaintiff being in receivership/liquidation
- 3 Appropriate costs category and time band (2B v 2C v 3)
Ratio Decidendi
Costs were fixed against all plaintiffs jointly and severally. The proceedings warranted Category 2 (not Category 3) and time band B. An uplift of one third (33.33%) was justified because the plaintiffs unnecessarily increased time and expense (late bundles, excessive objectionable evidence, poor presentation). Costs payable: defendants 1,3,4,5 and 6 $57,152 plus disbursements; defendant 2 $37,662.66 plus disbursements; uplift for second defendant limited to preparation time as acknowledged.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to defendants; fixed amounts set and ordered to be paid jointly and severally by the plaintiffs
Orders
- Costs to first, third, fourth, fifth and sixth defendants fixed at $57,152 plus disbursements as fixed by the Registrar
- Costs to second defendant fixed at $37,662.66 plus disbursements as fixed by the Registrar
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment