BODY CORPORATE 185960 AND ANOR V NORTH SHORE CITY COUNCIL AND ORS HC AK CIV-2006-004-003535
The Court categorised the proceeding as 3B, allowed an uplift from band B to band C for trial preparation and hearing to reflect delays and complexity, but declined to award increased or indemnity costs under r14.6 because the third defendant's opposing contractual interpretation was arguable and the delays did not warrant a separate increased costs order; awarded costs of $332,688 and disbursements of $90,162.01 to the plaintiffs.
- Citation
- openlaw-398a88e4_c88b_4c78_ae05_c961d98e3ef4.pdf
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Body Corporate 185960; Second Plaintiff: K J Gaitely and others; First Defendant: North Shore City Council; Second Defendant: R J Drew; Third Defendant: B Gailer; First Third Party: Celestar Property Developments Limited; Second Third Party: G L Norrish; Third Third Party: S Campbell; Fourth Third Party: I Driver; Fifth Third Party: Hibiscus Roofing Company Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (leaky Building / Damages) / Costs Application and Judgment on Costs (post Trial)
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to plaintiffs; proceeding categorised 3B with uplift to band C for trial preparation and hearing; application for increased or indemnity costs denied.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Increased Costs, Indemnity Costs, High Court Rules R14, Categorisation of Proceedings, Leaky Building Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Body Corporate 185960
First Plaintiff
K J Gaitely and others
Second Plaintiff
North Shore City Council
First Defendant
R J Drew
Second Defendant
B Gailer
Third Defendant
Celestar Property Developments Limited
First Third Party
G L Norrish
Second Third Party
S Campbell
Third Third Party
I Driver
Fourth Third Party
Hibiscus Roofing Company Limited
Fifth Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil (leaky Building / Damages) / Costs Application and Judgment on Costs (post Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper categorisation of the proceeding under High Court Rules r14.3
- 2 Whether uplift to band C for trial preparation and hearing is justified
- 3 Whether increased or indemnity costs under r14.6 should be awarded for opponent's conduct
Ratio Decidendi
The Court categorised the proceeding as 3B, allowed an uplift from band B to band C for trial preparation and hearing to reflect delays and complexity, but declined to award increased or indemnity costs under r14.6 because the third defendant's opposing contractual interpretation was arguable and the delays did not warrant a separate increased costs order; awarded costs of $332,688 and disbursements of $90,162.01 to the plaintiffs.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to plaintiffs; proceeding categorised 3B with uplift to band C for trial preparation and hearing; application for increased or indemnity costs denied.
Orders
- Costs awarded to plaintiffs in the amount NZD 332688
- Disbursements awarded to plaintiffs in the amount NZD 90162.01
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment