PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPER FINANCE V HRL CARTWRIGHT (ALSO KNOWN AS H JORONEN AND H SIMPSON) HC WN CIV-2012-485-2057
The court approved the creditors' proposal because the statutory procedures were complied with, the required majority of known creditors (six of seven holding 80.99% of indebtedness) voted in favour, and the terms—progressive payments over five years clearing approximately 81% of the total debt—were reasonable and beneficial to the general body of creditors, making it expedient to approve the proposal.
- Citation
- openlaw-8d6dafe0_20d7_493f_a675_346eeb7ce5ac.pdf
- Parties
- Creditor: PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPER FINANCE; Creditor: RADCLIFFE PROPERTIES LIMITED; Creditor: CREDIT SERVICES (NZ) LIMITED; Creditor: COLLECTION HOUSE (NZ) LIMITED; Creditor: MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL SERVICES NEW ZEALAND LIMITED; Creditor: RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED T/AS FARMERS FINANCE LIMITED; Creditor: Creditors (collective); Insolvent (applicant): HELEN REBECCA LOUISE CARTWRIGHT (ALSO KNOWN AS HELEN JORONEN AND HELEN SIMPSON)
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Approval of Creditors' Proposal / Hearing on Application for Approval Under S333 Insolvency Act 2006
- Outcome
- Application granted; proposal approved
- Legal Topics
- Creditors' Proposal, Court Approval Under S333, Creditor Voting, Debt Repayment Plan
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPER FINANCE
Creditor
RADCLIFFE PROPERTIES LIMITED
Creditor
CREDIT SERVICES (NZ) LIMITED
Creditor
COLLECTION HOUSE (NZ) LIMITED
Creditor
MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL SERVICES NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
Creditor
RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED T/AS FARMERS FINANCE LIMITED
Creditor
Creditors (collective)
Creditor
HELEN REBECCA LOUISE CARTWRIGHT (ALSO KNOWN AS HELEN JORONEN AND HELEN SIMPSON)
Insolvent (applicant)
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Approval of Creditors' Proposal / Hearing on Application for Approval Under S333 Insolvency Act 2006
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory provisions of Part 5 Sub‑Part 2 of the Insolvency Act 2006 were complied with
- 2 Whether the required majority of known creditors voted in favour of the proposal
- 3 Whether the terms of the proposal are reasonable and benefit the general body of creditors
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved the creditors' proposal because the statutory procedures were complied with, the required majority of known creditors (six of seven holding 80.99% of indebtedness) voted in favour, and the terms—progressive payments over five years clearing approximately 81% of the total debt—were reasonable and beneficial to the general body of creditors, making it expedient to approve the proposal.
Court Disposition
Application granted; proposal approved
Orders
- Order approving the applicant's Part 5 Sub‑Part 2 Insolvency Act 2006 proposal dated 26 September 2012
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment