MAY YAN WANG AND ANOR V COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE AND ANOR HC AK CIV-2010-404-3177
The Court refused approval because the insolvent's verified statement of affairs materially and demonstrably omitted and misrepresented key interests (notably her effective contingent/indirect beneficial and control position in the UBNZ Trust and undisclosed BVI company interests), such non‑disclosure meant the proposal did not comply with the statutory requirements (s327) and therefore approval could not be granted under s333; further, the proposal was not reasonable or expedient given the substantial trust property potentially available to creditors and the public interest in investigation by the Official Assignee.
- Citation
- openlaw-7905561c_ff30_4242_8f30_b1fc26a3bf59.pdf
- Parties
- Insolvent / Judgment Debtor: May Yan Wang; Applicant / Provisional Trustee: Jeffrey Philip Meltzer; Creditor / Respondent: Commissioner of Inland Revenue; Creditor: Latitude Asia Limited; Judgment Creditor: Westpac New Zealand Limited
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 6 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Court Approval of Creditors' Proposal Under Insolvency Act 2006 / Post Creditor Meeting Application to Court Following Creditors' Acceptance; Concurrent Bankruptcy Proceedings Adjourned
- Outcome
- Application to approve the creditors' proposal refused
- Legal Topics
- Creditors' Proposal Approval, Disclosure in Statement of Affairs, Priority of Tax Debts (gst), Convertible Notes, Discretionary Trust Control and Beneficiaries, Public Interest in Insolvency, Trust Deed Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
May Yan Wang
Insolvent / Judgment Debtor
Jeffrey Philip Meltzer
Applicant / Provisional Trustee
Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Creditor / Respondent
Latitude Asia Limited
Creditor
Westpac New Zealand Limited
Judgment Creditor
Procedural Posture
Application for Court Approval of Creditors' Proposal Under Insolvency Act 2006 / Post Creditor Meeting Application to Court Following Creditors' Acceptance; Concurrent Bankruptcy Proceedings Adjourned
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proposal complied with statutory disclosure requirements (s327 statement of affairs)
- 2 Whether proposal provided for payment of priority debts (GST) and trustee fees (s333(4))
- 3 Whether terms of the proposal are reasonable and benefit the general body of creditors (s333(3)(b))
Ratio Decidendi
The Court refused approval because the insolvent's verified statement of affairs materially and demonstrably omitted and misrepresented key interests (notably her effective contingent/indirect beneficial and control position in the UBNZ Trust and undisclosed BVI company interests), such non‑disclosure meant the proposal did not comply with the statutory requirements (s327) and therefore approval could not be granted under s333; further, the proposal was not reasonable or expedient given the substantial trust property potentially available to creditors and the public interest in investigation by the Official Assignee.
Court Disposition
Application to approve the creditors' proposal refused
Orders
- Application to approve proposal refused
- Bankruptcy proceeding adjourned to next day's list
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment