YU & ANOR v BRADLEY & ANOR [2019] NZHC 1455

YU & ANOR v BRADLEY & ANOR [2019] NZHC 1455

Costs of the plaintiffs' summary judgment application are to be reserved until the substantive proceeding is finally determined because this case is not exceptional; however the defendants are entitled to scale (2B) costs for the plaintiffs' unsuccessful application for leave to appeal.

Citation
[2019] NZHC 1455
Parties
First Plaintiff: Jing Jun Yu; Second Plaintiff: Andrew Investments (2004) Limited; Defendant: Dale Gordon Bradley; Defendant: Jilliananne Bradley
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
26 June 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Property/sale and Purchase Dispute / Costs Determination Following Unsuccessful Summary Judgment Application and Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Costs reserved for the summary judgment application until final determination of the substantive proceeding; defendants awarded scale (2B) costs for the leave to appeal application.
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Cancellation of Contract, Deposit Entitlement, Costs Reservation, Leave to Appeal, Contractual Remedies
Contract Property Civil Procedure Costs Law Summary Judgment Cancellation of Contract Deposit Entitlement Costs Reservation +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jing Jun Yu

First Plaintiff

Andrew Investments (2004) Limited

Second Plaintiff

Dale Gordon Bradley

Defendant

Jilliananne Bradley

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Property/sale and Purchase Dispute / Costs Determination Following Unsuccessful Summary Judgment Application and Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether summary judgment was appropriate for the plaintiffs' claim
  2. 2 Whether the defendants were entitled to retain the $230,000 deposit
  3. 3 Whether costs of the summary judgment application should be reserved or awarded to the defendants prior to trial

Ratio Decidendi

Costs of the plaintiffs' summary judgment application are to be reserved until the substantive proceeding is finally determined because this case is not exceptional; however the defendants are entitled to scale (2B) costs for the plaintiffs' unsuccessful application for leave to appeal.

Court Disposition

Costs reserved for the summary judgment application until final determination of the substantive proceeding; defendants awarded scale (2B) costs for the leave to appeal application.

Orders

  • Costs of the plaintiffs' summary judgment application reserved until determination of the substantive proceeding
  • Defendants awarded costs on a 2B basis against the plaintiffs in respect of the application for leave to appeal