WHITLOCK V WHITE HC ROT CIV-2011-463-000426

WHITLOCK V WHITE HC ROT CIV-2011-463-000426

The agreement was validly cancelled and the plaintiffs are entitled to repayment of $220,000 with interest from 12 May 2011; costs are awarded to the plaintiffs on a 2B basis with reasonable disbursements.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
openlaw-b0e79b28_0ae6_4a69_8339_a6391f3bf66a.pdf
Parties
Plaintiff: Dale William Whitlock and Joanne Elizabeth Renner; Defendant: Michael Theo White and Helen May White
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
8 December 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Contract Dispute / Judgment on Formal Proof
Outcome
Judgment for plaintiffs for repayment of $220,000 with interest from 12 May 2011; costs awarded to plaintiffs on a 2B basis with reasonable disbursements.
Legal Topics
Refund of Deposit, Cancellation of Contract, Interest, Costs
Contract Property Equity Civil Procedure Refund of Deposit Cancellation of Contract Interest Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dale William Whitlock and Joanne Elizabeth Renner

Plaintiff

Michael Theo White and Helen May White

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Contract Dispute / Judgment on Formal Proof

  1. 1 Whether plaintiffs are entitled to refund of $220,000 paid under agreement for subdivision and transfer
  2. 2 Whether plaintiffs validly cancelled the agreement
  3. 3 Whether interest is payable and from what date

Ratio Decidendi

The agreement was validly cancelled and the plaintiffs are entitled to repayment of $220,000 with interest from 12 May 2011; costs are awarded to the plaintiffs on a 2B basis with reasonable disbursements.

Court Disposition

Judgment for plaintiffs for repayment of $220,000 with interest from 12 May 2011; costs awarded to plaintiffs on a 2B basis with reasonable disbursements.

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the plaintiffs in the sum of $220,000.
  • Defendants to pay interest to the plaintiffs from 12 May 2011 at the rate prescribed in the Judicature Act 1908.