R v LYTTLE [2019] NZHC 3454
Life imprisonment is appropriate and not manifestly unjust in this case; minimum non-parole period set at 11 years based on lack of premeditation (single shot), significant aggravation from post-offence conduct including concealment of the body and obstruction/false information during a major search, and mitigation...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 3454
- Parties
- Crown: The Queen; Defendant: David Owen Lyttle
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Murder / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted of murder; sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum non-parole period of 11 years
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Life Imprisonment, Minimum Non Parole Period, Mr Big Undercover Operation, Disclosure Delay, Concealment of Body
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Crown
David Owen Lyttle
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Murder / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 whether life imprisonment would be manifestly unjust
- 2 appropriate minimum non-parole period under Sentencing Act
- 3 reliability and admissibility of Mr Big confession evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Life imprisonment is appropriate and not manifestly unjust in this case; minimum non-parole period set at 11 years based on lack of premeditation (single shot), significant aggravation from post-offence conduct including concealment of the body and obstruction/false information during a major search, and mitigation for trial delay and restrictive bail measures which largely offset each other.
Court Disposition
Convicted of murder; sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum non-parole period of 11 years
Orders
- Sentence of life imprisonment imposed
- Minimum non-parole period fixed at 11 years
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment