DAWN LORRAINE GREENFIELD v THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT [2015] NZSC 57

DAWN LORRAINE GREENFIELD v THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT [2015] NZSC 57

Leave to appeal was granted because the correct interpretation of "ordinarily resident in New Zealand" in s 8(a) raises a significant question of law warranting Supreme Court consideration; the Court did not decide the substantive issue on the merits.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] NZSC 57
Parties
Applicant: Dawn Lorraine Greenfield; Respondent: The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
New Zealand
Judgment Date
11 May 2015
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Leave Granted by Supreme Court
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal granted
Legal Topics
Ordinarily Resident, Superannuation Entitlement, Interpretation of Residence Requirement
Social Security Law Statutory Interpretation Administrative Law Ordinarily Resident Superannuation Entitlement Interpretation of Residence Requirement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dawn Lorraine Greenfield

Applicant

The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Leave Granted by Supreme Court

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal correctly interpreted the phrase "ordinarily resident in New Zealand" in s 8(a) of the New Zealand Superannuation and Retirement Income Act 2001

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was granted because the correct interpretation of "ordinarily resident in New Zealand" in s 8(a) raises a significant question of law warranting Supreme Court consideration; the Court did not decide the substantive issue on the merits.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal granted

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted to the Supreme Court (Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development v Greenfield [2014] NZCA 611).
  • Approved ground of appeal: whether the Court of Appeal correctly interpreted the phrase "ordinarily resident in New Zealand" in s 8(a) of the New Zealand Superannuation and Retirement Income Act 2001.